Perhaps you should go back to MS Word? :)
Just teasing...sorry, Tim, I couldn't help myself!
Regards,
Dimi
Dimi Everette, Sr. Technical Writer, Video Information Design
7700 W Parmer Lane, Bldg C, Suite 100, Austin, TX 78729 | t: 512.372.6988 | f:
512.372.7001
A series of tutorials are posted
here: http://www.adobe.com/support/captivate/gettingstarted.html
Most folks who have used it say that it's pretty good. Give these a test drive.
Vikrant
Disclosure: Even if I didn't work for Adobe, I would have recommended this.
Patternstream from Finite Matters Ltd would handle this very easily, I do
similar projects with data in Excel, all coded for Paragraphs, and with b
/b etc for Character Formatting. My heavily formatted and tabled book of 750
pages takes 17 minutes to run, including TOC's and Index. The new
I'm planning to do a major revamp of some of our documentation. As part of
that process, I want to work with smaller, more topic-oriented files. I
want to split my current documents up into files at the heading 2 and
possibly heading 3 level.
Does anyone have a script or add-in that would do
Dear Framers:
I recently merged single chapter files into volumes, thus, for example, one
volume may contain 8 chapters.
However, I now cannot get FM to set each chapter's footnotes to start at 1.
Thus each chapter would have its own flight of footnotes.
I am using the document numbering dialogue
Rob Shell wrote:
However, I now cannot get FM to set each chapter's footnotes to start
at 1.
Thus each chapter would have its own flight of footnotes.
I am using the document numbering dialogue box
And setting the footnote number to one. However, no luck. FM accepts
the
call, but does
meusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20120208/b362bed8/attachment.html>
Rob Shell wrote:
> However, I now cannot get FM to set each chapter's footnotes to start
> at 1.
> Thus each chapter would have its own flight of footnotes.
> I am using the document numbering dialogue box
> And "setting" the footnote number to one. However, no luck. FM accepts
> the
> call, but
