Deletion of a file normally does not result in any registry modifications
whatsoever! When you delete a file, changes are made to the directory
entries and the space allocation tables on your disk partition. That should
be it. Taking "several minutes just to delete a 2KB file using Windows
Explorer
Deletion of a file normally does not result in any registry modifications
whatsoever! When you delete a file, changes are made to the directory
entries and the space allocation tables on your disk partition. That should
be it. Taking "several minutes just to delete a 2KB file using Windows
Explorer
Although the Acrobat 9 Pro installation does take a tremendous amount of disk
space
(of which nearly 725MB are the installation files so that Acrobat can "self
heal"
when there are problems), that does not account for the two hour installation
cited.
I have performed Acrobat 9 Pro Extended inst
Although the Acrobat 9 Pro installation does take a tremendous amount of disk
space
(of which nearly 725MB are the installation files so that Acrobat can "self
heal"
when there are problems), that does not account for the two hour installation
cited.
I have performed Acrobat 9 Pro Extended inst
Actually, the Adobe Technical Communication Suite 2 doesn't come on a CD but
rather,
on two DVDs!
And no, Adobe is not releasing TCS2 to include the first set of FrameMaker 9
patches.
You will need to apply those yourself after installation.
- Dov
> -Original Message-
> From: f
Actually, the Adobe Technical Communication Suite 2 doesn't come on a CD but
rather,
on two DVDs!
And no, Adobe is not releasing TCS2 to include the first set of FrameMaker 9
patches.
You will need to apply those yourself after installation.
- Dov
> -Original Message-
> From: f
The FrameMaker 9.0.1 update has just been released. You can get it via the
updates
feature within FrameMaker (or any other current Adobe application).
- Dov
_
List of major issues resolved in this updat
The FrameMaker 9.0.1 update has just been released. You can get it via the
updates
feature within FrameMaker (or any other current Adobe application).
- Dov
_
List of major issues resolved in this updat
In terms of safety and reliability, create the PDF only on the system that has
all
the fonts. Otherwise you cannot count on the fonts mysteriously appearing when
you
are making plates for the offset press (or printing on any printer for that
matter!).
- Dov
> -Original Message-
In terms of safety and reliability, create the PDF only on the system that has
all
the fonts. Otherwise you cannot count on the fonts mysteriously appearing when
you
are making plates for the offset press (or printing on any printer for that
matter!).
- Dov
> -Original Message-
WRONG! Regardless of the merits and foibles of the "save as PDF" facility in
various versions of FrameMaker, all in fact explicitly use the Distiller.
How do think the PostScript is turned into PDF otherwise? FrameMaker
(exceptionally unfortunately) unlike InDesign, Illustrator, and Photoshop
does
WRONG! Regardless of the merits and foibles of the "save as PDF" facility in
various versions of FrameMaker, all in fact explicitly use the Distiller.
How do think the PostScript is turned into PDF otherwise? FrameMaker
(exceptionally unfortunately) unlike InDesign, Illustrator, and Photoshop
does
.
- Dov
> -Original Message-
> From: Diane Gaskill [mailto:dgcal...@earthlink.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 9:00 PM
> To: Dov Isaacs; Frame Users
> Subject: RE: Desperately Need Legal FrameMaker 8!
>
> Dov, does Adobe have offical EOL dates on it'
.
- Dov
> -Original Message-
> From: Diane Gaskill [mailto:dgcaller at earthlink.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 9:00 PM
> To: Dov Isaacs; Frame Users
> Subject: RE: Desperately Need Legal FrameMaker 8!
>
> Dov, does Adobe have offical EOL dates on it'
Dov
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Houser [mailto:a...@groupwellesley.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 7:54 PM
> To: Dov Isaacs
> Cc: Frame Users
> Subject: Re: Desperately Need Legal FrameMaker 8!
>
> I don't get a vote, but I would love to see
Dov
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Houser [mailto:arh at groupwellesley.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 7:54 PM
> To: Dov Isaacs
> Cc: Frame Users
> Subject: Re: Desperately Need Legal FrameMaker 8!
>
> I don't get a vote, but I would love to see
FWIW, no company is ever going to get any additional copies of FrameMaker 8
shipped from Adobe or any of our channel partners. The fact is that Adobe
very carefully controls how much inventory there is in the channel so that
by the time a new release is announced and shipping, the likelihood of fin
FWIW, no company is ever going to get any additional copies of FrameMaker 8
shipped from Adobe or any of our channel partners. The fact is that Adobe
very carefully controls how much inventory there is in the channel so that
by the time a new release is announced and shipping, the likelihood of fin
ittle compression with not any real noticeable
improvement over a maximum quality JPEG-compressed photographic image.
- Dov
> -Original Message-
> From: jalo...@gmail.com [mailto:jalo...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Joseph
> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 9:45 AM
> To: Dov Isaac
ittle compression with not any real noticeable
improvement over a maximum quality JPEG-compressed photographic image.
- Dov
> -Original Message-
> From: jaloren at gmail.com [mailto:jaloren at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Joseph
> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 9:45 AM
> To:
Maximum quality Automatic (JPEG) compression with downsampling to 300dpi for
images
over 450dpi should maintain exceptionally high quality for photographic images
using
JPEG compression and ZIP compression for vector-like images (such as screen
shots).
Alternatively, maximum Automatic (JPEG2000
Maximum quality Automatic (JPEG) compression with downsampling to 300dpi for
images
over 450dpi should maintain exceptionally high quality for photographic images
using
JPEG compression and ZIP compression for vector-like images (such as screen
shots).
Alternatively, maximum Automatic (JPEG2000
For the record, I NEVER said that PDF was designed to create manuals
only for printing, but rather, that it is indeed a "final form file format."
That implies neither just printing nor just viewing. It does imply a
fairly static document layout, though, with the possibility of limited
interactivity
For the record, I NEVER said that PDF was designed to create manuals
only for printing, but rather, that it is indeed a "final form file format."
That implies neither just printing nor just viewing. It does imply a
fairly static document layout, though, with the possibility of limited
interactivity
Editable PDF? Are you kidding? PDF is a final form file format. Any edits
that you can do in PDF should be restricted to emergency situations only.
PDF does not maintain any of the context of the original source document.
The concepts of words, sentences, paragraphs, etc. is limited at best
(if the
Editable PDF? Are you kidding? PDF is a final form file format. Any edits
that you can do in PDF should be restricted to emergency situations only.
PDF does not maintain any of the context of the original source document.
The concepts of words, sentences, paragraphs, etc. is limited at best
(if the
ler-Hillebrand [mailto:m...@cap-studio.de]
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 2:12 AM
> To: Dov Isaacs
> Subject: [Free Framers] Re: Utilities for FrameMaker ligatures
>
>
> Am 05.02.2009 um 04:17 schrieb Hedley Finger:
>
> > A couple of people wrote to me directly as
ler-Hillebrand [mailto:m...@cap-studio.de]
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 2:12 AM
> To: Dov Isaacs
> Subject: [Free Framers] Re: Utilities for FrameMaker ligatures
>
>
> Am 05.02.2009 um 04:17 schrieb Hedley Finger:
>
> > A couple of people wrote to me directly as
r-Hillebrand [mailto:mmh at cap-studio.de]
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 2:12 AM
> To: Dov Isaacs
> Subject: [Free Framers] Re: Utilities for FrameMaker ligatures
>
>
> Am 05.02.2009 um 04:17 schrieb Hedley Finger:
>
> > A couple of people wrote to me directly as
r-Hillebrand [mailto:mmh at cap-studio.de]
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 2:12 AM
> To: Dov Isaacs
> Subject: [Free Framers] Re: Utilities for FrameMaker ligatures
>
>
> Am 05.02.2009 um 04:17 schrieb Hedley Finger:
>
> > A couple of people wrote to me directly as
WMF is a vector format based on Windows GDI. That's why it looks smooth and
is certainly preferable to PNG which is raster and for print purposes, unless
you go to 600dpi or more for Visio vector style drawing, PNG will look cruddy!
Be careful with WMF, though! Sometimes text doesn't make it "thro
WMF is a vector format based on Windows GDI. That's why it looks smooth and
is certainly preferable to PNG which is raster and for print purposes, unless
you go to 600dpi or more for Visio vector style drawing, PNG will look cruddy!
Be careful with WMF, though! Sometimes text doesn't make it "thro
FWIW, FrameMaker's code base was not "rewritten" but rather, modified to
support Unicode.
Unicode support does not necessarily include support for "input methods"
for all writing systems. FrameMaker doesn't have input methods for either
Hebrew or Arabic, which by the way although both are right-to
FWIW, FrameMaker's code base was not "rewritten" but rather, modified to
support Unicode.
Unicode support does not necessarily include support for "input methods"
for all writing systems. FrameMaker doesn't have input methods for either
Hebrew or Arabic, which by the way although both are right-to
I would hardly say that multipage TIFF files are pretty common unless
your pretty common world of TIFF is primarily FAX servers.
- Dov
> -Original Message-
> From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
> [mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of
> Alan Litchfield
I would hardly say that multipage TIFF files are pretty common unless
your pretty common world of TIFF is primarily FAX servers.
- Dov
> -Original Message-
> From: framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com [mailto:framers-bounces at
> lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of
> Alan Litc
On the off-chance that you were not joking and on behalf of Adobe,
let me assure you that Adobe has no "built-in timer in FM itself" for
any purpose of forcing users to upgrade to "make money selling upgrades."
The only so called "timers" in any Adobe products are associated with
controlling test
On the off-chance that you were not joking and on behalf of Adobe,
let me assure you that Adobe has no "built-in timer in FM itself" for
any purpose of forcing users to upgrade to "make money selling upgrades."
The only so called "timers" in any Adobe products are associated with
controlling test
To be fairly clear about this, FrameMaker never natively supported import of
Visio drawings. What FrameMaker does support is Microsoft's OLE, Object Linking
and Embedding protocol by which you can place content from one application into
another effectively as a Window to that application. In the
To be fairly clear about this, FrameMaker never natively supported import of
Visio drawings. What FrameMaker does support is Microsoft's OLE, Object Linking
and Embedding protocol by which you can place content from one application into
another effectively as a Window to that application. In the
Unless you are producing something very simple like a four page booklet,
i.e., a single sheet of paper folded in half, your best bet is to create
your document in FrameMaker in terms of logical pages, 1 through n. Then,
create PDF of the FrameMaker document, again in logical page order.
Once you a
Unless you are producing something very simple like a four page booklet,
i.e., a single sheet of paper folded in half, your best bet is to create
your document in FrameMaker in terms of logical pages, 1 through n. Then,
create PDF of the FrameMaker document, again in logical page order.
Once you a
If you never licensed FrameMaker 7.2, no.
- Dov
> -Original Message-
> From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
> [mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of
> Kamen, Sara
> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 1:18 AM
> To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
> Subject: Fra
If you never licensed FrameMaker 7.2, no.
- Dov
> -Original Message-
> From: framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com [mailto:framers-bounces at
> lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of
> Kamen, Sara
> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 1:18 AM
> To: framers at lists.frameusers.com
> Sub
Susan Modlin; Dov Isaacs; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: Re-installing FM 8 onto a new drive ...
I do not know about FM 7.2 and Vista - so maybe Dov can comment on that.
But, at least, I can now confirm that FrameMaker 8 runs fine on Vista 32 bit.
:) The look and feel of the windows an
56 PM
To: Susan Modlin; Dov Isaacs; framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: Re-installing FM 8 onto a new drive ...
I do not know about FM 7.2 and Vista - so maybe Dov can comment on that.
But, at least, I can now confirm that FrameMaker 8 runs fine on Vista 32 bit.
:) The look and feel o
(1) FrameMaker 8 works fine on both Vista 32-bit and Vista 64-bit
assuming that if you are running Acrobat, you are using at least
Acrobat 8.1.
(2) You should ALWAYS cleanly uninstall Adobe applications. Actually
you should first "deactivate" them and then uninstall them. Failure to
do tha
(1) FrameMaker 8 works fine on both Vista 32-bit and Vista 64-bit
assuming that if you are running Acrobat, you are using at least
Acrobat 8.1.
(2) You should ALWAYS cleanly uninstall Adobe applications. Actually
you should first "deactivate" them and then uninstall them. Failure to
do tha
Try rebooting your system first. There may be some resource which is
oversubscribed or locked.
BTW, why are so many of you suffering from "Reinstallzheimers"? In fact,
very, very few problems have been resolved by simply reinstalling software.
- Dov
> -Original Message-
> From: [
Try rebooting your system first. There may be some resource which is
oversubscribed or locked.
BTW, why are so many of you suffering from "Reinstallzheimers"? In fact,
very, very few problems have been resolved by simply reinstalling software.
- Dov
> -Original Message-
> From: f
ng the problem.
One thing they could have done is disabled is overall support for Type 1
and OpenType CFF fonts. Check for that in the appropriate XP Control Panel.
- Dov
> -Original Message-
> From: Joel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 11:08 AM
&
ng the problem.
One thing they could have done is disabled is overall support for Type 1
and OpenType CFF fonts. Check for that in the appropriate XP Control Panel.
- Dov
> -Original Message-
> From: Joel [mailto:eleysium at gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 1
about problems with certain
fonts when certain video card drivers are used.
- Dov
> -Original Message-
> From: Joel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 10:25 AM
> To: Dov Isaacs
> Cc: framers@lists.frameusers.com
> Subject: Re: fonts in Fram
about problems with certain
fonts when certain video card drivers are used.
- Dov
> -Original Message-
> From: Joel [mailto:eleysium at gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 10:25 AM
> To: Dov Isaacs
> Cc: framers at lists.frameusers.com
> Subject: Re: fonts
Joel,
I've tried to create a new document in FrameMaker 8 (with all updates applied)
using Myriad Pro, Myriad Pro Bold, Myriad Pro Semicondensed, and Myriad Pro
Semicondensed Bold. I am running under Vista 32-bit and Vista 64-bit although
that should not make a difference here. For better or worse
Joel,
I've tried to create a new document in FrameMaker 8 (with all updates applied)
using Myriad Pro, Myriad Pro Bold, Myriad Pro Semicondensed, and Myriad Pro
Semicondensed Bold. I am running under Vista 32-bit and Vista 64-bit although
that should not make a difference here. For better or worse
There is an exceptionally simple solution to this. Go the settings for
the Adobe PDF PostScript printer driver instance. Under "Properties" go
to the "Device Settings" tab and change "Convert Gray Text to PostScript Gray"
and "Convert Gray Graphics to PostScript Gray" BOTH to "Yes." As a result
all
There is an exceptionally simple solution to this. Go the settings for
the Adobe PDF PostScript printer driver instance. Under "Properties" go
to the "Device Settings" tab and change "Convert Gray Text to PostScript Gray"
and "Convert Gray Graphics to PostScript Gray" BOTH to "Yes." As a result
all
FrameMaker 8 certainly does handle fonts differently from earlier versions.
It is a Unicode application and such changes in character mappings is a major
area to watch out for when migrating any document to FrameMaker 8 that
uses characters in fonts that are not mapped correctly. All the Wingding,
FrameMaker 8 certainly does handle fonts differently from earlier versions.
It is a Unicode application and such changes in character mappings is a major
area to watch out for when migrating any document to FrameMaker 8 that
uses characters in fonts that are not mapped correctly. All the Wingding,
.notdef is part of a font definition. The fact that this is showing
up as an undefined PostScript operator would lead me to believe that
your PostScript file is either incomplete or corrupted. I've seen a
similar problem occur if one runs out of disk space while the PostScript
file is being written
.notdef is part of a font definition. The fact that this is showing
up as an undefined PostScript operator would lead me to believe that
your PostScript file is either incomplete or corrupted. I've seen a
similar problem occur if one runs out of disk space while the PostScript
file is being written
To be very specific about this (and to hopefully avoid the seemingly
annual "FrameMaker is dead" ritual), there are absolutely NO plans within
Adobe at this time to discontinue FrameMaker in favor of InDesign. The
features added to InDesign that are "Framemaker-like" are specifically
per the reques
To be very specific about this (and to hopefully avoid the seemingly
annual "FrameMaker is dead" ritual), there are absolutely NO plans within
Adobe at this time to discontinue FrameMaker in favor of InDesign. The
features added to InDesign that are "Framemaker-like" are specifically
per the reques
As a followup to a recent thread about FrameMaker versus InDesign, per the
message posted below on an InDesign list, Adobe just published the files
(including PDF) for InDesign 6 and InCopy 6 Help.
Guess what was used to produce these?
(Hint: Download and open the PDF file and hit Ctrl-D)
As a followup to a recent thread about FrameMaker versus InDesign, per the
message posted below on an InDesign list, Adobe just published the files
(including PDF) for InDesign 6 and InCopy 6 Help.
Guess what was used to produce these?
(Hint: Download and open the PDF file and hit Ctrl-D)
Stuart,
Ironically, Acrobat has never had any "black and white display mode."
Congratulations, you've invented a new feature for an old product.
However, Acrobat does have an "accessibility" display feature (although
I don't recall how many versions back that went - Acrobat 6 is over 5
years old
;
> ________
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Dov Isaacs
> Sent: Fri 9/12/2008 11:46 AM
> To: framers; Graeme R Forbes
> Subject: RE: InDesign as a replacement for Framemaker
>
>
>
> Graeme,
>
> Don't count on getting that extra act
john
>
>
>
> From: framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com on behalf of Dov Isaacs
> Sent: Fri 9/12/2008 11:46 AM
> To: framers; Graeme R Forbes
> Subject: RE: InDesign as a replacement for Framemaker
>
>
>
> Graeme,
>
> Don't
Graeme,
Don't count on getting that extra activation. The EULA is quite clear
in terms of how many systems - two - you may simultaneously install and
activate simultaneously and that you may legally only execute on one of
those at any time. I hardly see how your request is related to "natural
just
Graeme,
Don't count on getting that extra activation. The EULA is quite clear
in terms of how many systems - two - you may simultaneously install and
activate simultaneously and that you may legally only execute on one of
those at any time. I hardly see how your request is related to "natural
just
PM
>
> Hi, Dov:
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Dov Isaacs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > To be very clear, although designed as a replacement for PageMaker, InDesign
> > was certainly not designed by Adobe to be a "replacement for FrameMaker."
> >
PM
>
> Hi, Dov:
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Dov Isaacs wrote:
> > To be very clear, although designed as a replacement for PageMaker, InDesign
> > was certainly not designed by Adobe to be a "replacement for FrameMaker."
> >
> > Yes, over time
To be very clear, although designed as a replacement for PageMaker, InDesign
was certainly not designed by Adobe to be a "replacement for FrameMaker."
Yes, over time a number of FrameMaker features have been incorporated into
InDesign, but unless you are using none of FrameMaker's structured featu
To be very clear, although designed as a replacement for PageMaker, InDesign
was certainly not designed by Adobe to be a "replacement for FrameMaker."
Yes, over time a number of FrameMaker features have been incorporated into
InDesign, but unless you are using none of FrameMaker's structured featu
x27;m unsure which version, actually) your current
> license agreement may not cover
> use of the old version fonts.
>
> Dov, what is correct here ???
>
> Best regards
> Jacob Schäffer
> Grafikhuset
> Denmark
>
>
> > -Oprindelig meddelelse-
> > Fra
x27;m unsure which version, actually) your current
> license agreement may not cover
> use of the old version fonts.
>
> Dov, what is correct here ???
>
> Best regards
> Jacob Sch?ffer
> Grafikhuset
> Denmark
>
>
> > -Oprindelig meddelelse-
> >
The original problem reported by Paul stems from the Windows
"phantom phont phenomena!" Windows font enumeration, used by standard
Windows applications (such as FrameMaker), allows printer drivers to
insert font information to be passed back to the application even if
such fonts are not actually in
The original problem reported by Paul stems from the Windows
"phantom phont phenomena!" Windows font enumeration, used by standard
Windows applications (such as FrameMaker), allows printer drivers to
insert font information to be passed back to the application even if
such fonts are not actually in
OK, I tried this myself with FrameMaker 8.0p277 (the latest update).
I typed the same text with quotes (using the standard US keyboard straight
double quote - i.e., the inch character - as my double quote character)
in Times New Roman, Arial, Minion Pro, and Myriad Pro.
For all four lines of text
OK, I tried this myself with FrameMaker 8.0p277 (the latest update).
I typed the same text with quotes (using the standard US keyboard straight
double quote - i.e., the inch character - as my double quote character)
in Times New Roman, Arial, Minion Pro, and Myriad Pro.
For all four lines of text
sorry!
- Dov
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Zaichenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2008 8:45 AM
> To: Dov Isaacs
> Subject: RE: ACTIVATING FONTS
>
> Dear Dov,
> thanks for such an extensive answer. I had no idea. What handles
sorry!
- Dov
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Zaichenko [mailto:biozaichenko at hotmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2008 8:45 AM
> To: Dov Isaacs
> Subject: RE: ACTIVATING FONTS
>
> Dear Dov,
> thanks for such an extensive answer. I had no idea. What handles
Michael,
Contrary to what you may believe, FrameMaker has no "autoactivation"
option it it. Like other Windows applications, when a font is added to
the system, via Windows' standard "Add Fonts" control panel option or
via ATM (or for that matter any font manager that properly interfaces
with Wind
Michael,
Contrary to what you may believe, FrameMaker has no "autoactivation"
option it it. Like other Windows applications, when a font is added to
the system, via Windows' standard "Add Fonts" control panel option or
via ATM (or for that matter any font manager that properly interfaces
with Wind
I've seen this problem before and it generally has nothing to do with either
FrameMaker or Acrobat, but rather, secret sauce in the operating system and its
interface with the PostScript driver with regards to the "Symbol" font.
The symptoms you report usually would indicate that somehow the TrueTy
I've seen this problem before and it generally has nothing to do with either
FrameMaker or Acrobat, but rather, secret sauce in the operating system and its
interface with the PostScript driver with regards to the "Symbol" font.
The symptoms you report usually would indicate that somehow the TrueTy
I hardly consider them heroes. Vandalism is vandalism. They could have
made their point very well by photographing all these signs, putting up
a web page with the "evidence" and the required corrections, and then
calling a press conference and making a media event out of it. If everybody
simply van
I hardly consider them heroes. Vandalism is vandalism. They could have
made their point very well by photographing all these signs, putting up
a web page with the "evidence" and the required corrections, and then
calling a press conference and making a media event out of it. If everybody
simply van
ely deal with.)
- Dov
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 6:35 AM
> To: Dov Isaacs; framers@lists.frameusers.com
> Subject: Re: why am I having missing fonts in FM8, and how to correct?
>
&g
ely deal with.)
- Dov
> -Original Message-
> From: ActionA at aol.com [mailto:ActionA at aol.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 6:35 AM
> To: Dov Isaacs; framers at lists.frameusers.com
> Subject: Re: why am I having missing fonts in FM8, and how to correct?
>
FrameMaker 8 continues to support use of Type 1 fonts (I assume that is
what you mean by "PS fonts") as well as TrueType and OpenType fonts. The
character set of the Type 1 fonts are mapped into Unicode.
You don't say what type of "font errors" you are getting (missing fonts?
mismapped characters?
FrameMaker 8 continues to support use of Type 1 fonts (I assume that is
what you mean by "PS fonts") as well as TrueType and OpenType fonts. The
character set of the Type 1 fonts are mapped into Unicode.
You don't say what type of "font errors" you are getting (missing fonts?
mismapped characters?
Friday, July 18, 2008 2:16 PM
> To: Dov Isaacs; framers@lists.frameusers.com
> Subject: RE: Frame & Acrobat upgrades
>
> But how about the interim stage when I'm still on Frame 6 with Acrobat
> 9. Is that asking for trouble?
> Thanks,
> Jo
>
> -Original Message-
ent: Friday, July 18, 2008 2:16 PM
> To: Dov Isaacs; framers at lists.frameusers.com
> Subject: RE: Frame & Acrobat upgrades
>
> But how about the interim stage when I'm still on Frame 6 with Acrobat
> 9. Is that asking for trouble?
> Thanks,
> Jo
>
> -Origin
FrameMaker 8 and Acrobat 9 are fully compatible!
- Dov
> -Original Message-
> From: Jo Watkiss
> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 7:04 AM
>
> I'm currently using Frame 6 and Acrobat 5 on Windows XP.
> I'm about to upgrade to Acrobat 9, and will (in time) upgrade to Frame
> 8.
>
> Can a
FrameMaker 8 and Acrobat 9 are fully compatible!
- Dov
> -Original Message-
> From: Jo Watkiss
> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 7:04 AM
>
> I'm currently using Frame 6 and Acrobat 5 on Windows XP.
> I'm about to upgrade to Acrobat 9, and will (in time) upgrade to Frame
> 8.
>
> Can a
Paul,
My HP 8710w notebook does NOT have a glossy screen! I believe that
the glossy screen is only available with the low resolution model,
i.e., 1680x1050 as opposed to 1920x1200. I have the high resolution
model.
You cannot directly connect a digital monitor to the 8710w. You must
use a docking
Paul,
My HP 8710w notebook does NOT have a glossy screen! I believe that
the glossy screen is only available with the low resolution model,
i.e., 1680x1050 as opposed to 1920x1200. I have the high resolution
model.
You cannot directly connect a digital monitor to the 8710w. You must
use a docking
t;PDF Creation Add-on" or was it an option? You certainly
don't need it if you have full Acrobat!!
- Dov
From: Hedley Finger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 1:28 AM
To: Dov Isaacs
Cc: Paul Findon; FrameUsers List
Subject: Re: PDF Creation Add-o
201 - 300 of 703 matches
Mail list logo
