Interchange vs Analysis

2006-02-02 Thread mc...@allette.com.au
Bernard wrote: > I generally have to agree with what is written below, but I have to take a > minor exception on (a) regarding 'the line that you can do it with DITA or > DocBook'. Out of the box does a good job, but unfortunately the 'good job' > is at scaring people away. I consider DITA to be

Interchange vs Analysis

2006-02-01 Thread mcarr
Bernard wrote: I generally have to agree with what is written below, but I have to take a minor exception on (a) regarding 'the line that you can do it with DITA or DocBook'. Out of the box does a good job, but unfortunately the 'good job' is at scaring people away. I consider DITA to be an

RE: Interchange vs. Analysis

2006-02-01 Thread Daniel Emory
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I consider DITA to be an interchange format. If two organisations can figure out how to convert their own structure to and from DITA, they can freely exchange data. Add five more organisations and impose the same requirement on them and everyone can exchange data,

Interchange vs. Analysis

2006-02-01 Thread Daniel Emory
--- mcarr at allette.com.au wrote: > I consider DITA to be an interchange format. If two > organisations can figure out how to convert their own structure > to and from DITA, they can freely exchange data. Add five more > organisations and impose the same requirement on them and everyone can