Obviously, take with a grain of salt, but some interesting points,
nonetheless.
TVB
http://www.9news.com/money/article.aspx?storyid=68237
Tammy L. Van Boening
Senior Technical Writer
Fiserv Insurance Solutions
Property and Casualty Division
303-729-7733
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 09:32 -0600 18/4/07, Van Boening, Tammy wrote:
Obviously, take with a grain of salt, but some interesting points,
nonetheless.
This is all we need: yet another set of web 'standards'.
The NYT site that the article refers to was a mess.
'While Microsoft's hybrid applications can only be
Gosh, you said it, and I agree wholeheartedly. The
field is cluttered enough already, and I'm not sure of
the demonstrable need for either one of these. Users
will watch television when they want television, but
on the web they want function, even if that function
is chat rooms, forums,
Obviously, take with a grain of salt, but some interesting points,
nonetheless.
TVB
http://www.9news.com/money/article.aspx?storyid=68237
Tammy L. Van Boening
Senior Technical Writer
Fiserv Insurance Solutions
Property and Casualty Division
303-729-7733
tammy.vanboening at fiserv.com
At 09:32 -0600 18/4/07, Van Boening, Tammy wrote:
>Obviously, take with a grain of salt, but some interesting points,
>nonetheless.
This is all we need: yet another set of web 'standards'.
The NYT site that the article refers to was a mess.
'While Microsoft's hybrid applications can only be
Gosh, you said it, and I agree wholeheartedly. The
field is cluttered enough already, and I'm not sure of
the demonstrable need for either one of these. Users
will watch television when they want television, but
on the web they want function, even if that function
is chat rooms, forums,