RE: Going nutso' with a phantom cross-reference

2006-07-16 Thread hedley . finger
Fred, Tammy: Checking for unresolved x-refs with all conditions showing establishes that all the x-refs are good, and you should then be able to document that the bad ones that are reported in the Book Errors windows when you publish any given conditionalized version are due only to hidden

RE: Going nutso' with a phantom cross-reference

2006-07-14 Thread Ridder, Fred
If you conditionalize any cross-references, it is virtually inevitable that you will get unresolved errors when you do an update book operation with some condition(s) set to be hidden, regardless of the dictates of your company's SQA rules. When FrameMaker does a book update, it check's *all*

RE: Going nutso' with a phantom cross-reference

2006-07-14 Thread Tammy . VanBoening
Thank you Fred. Your very articulate statement at the end about If that's not possible, your SQA rules will just have to be modified to accept a list of exceptions for cross-references that are reported as unresolved for a particular set of show/hide condition settings. Checking for