This is intriguing to me. My understanding was that Classic, and
therefore OS 9, wouldn't run on any of the later machines, particularly
any Intel-based machines. .
The confusion comes from whether the computer can BOOT, that is start up, in
OS 9 -- or can it run OS 9 in Classic
At 14:48 -0700 9/10/06, Sam Beard wrote:
This is intriguing to me. My understanding was that Classic, and
therefore OS 9, wouldn't run on any of the later machines, particularly
any Intel-based machines. Are either of you running one of these? What
machines are you running? Are you running OS
: RE: OS 9 Applications on Tiger
I'm running this on a Mac Mini with a G4 proc.
It's been a long time since I set it up, but as best as I can remember,
I installed the Classic environment as part of the initial setup and
configuration of Tiger. This required the use of a Classic
environment disk
Hey Peter,
I agree that this is an excellent series of books! I have one from OS
X 10.1, I believe. I was looking for one for Frame, since there are so
many others out there. Alas, I wasn't able to find one, so have been
looking for another good book for Frame. I recently bought the
?
Thanks much,
Sam Beard
Technical Communications - Special Projects
CTES - LP
936 521-2241
-Original Message-
From: Steve Rickaby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 5:40 AM
To: Sam Beard
Cc: framers@FrameUsers.com
Subject: RE: OS 9 Applications on Tiger
At 14:48
At 07:35 -0700 10/10/06, Sam Beard wrote:
Thanks for the input. Yes, I was mistakenly thinking that the issue
was with the OS itself.
No sweat - easy mistake to make.
I knew that the last round, I believe, of G4s as well as the G5s didn't
support dual-booting. They still ran Classic, I
On 10 Oct 2006, at 07:00, fAnn Zdunczyk wrote:
I have a G5 running Panther that I purchased several years ago. A
purchased
an upgrade for one of my applications and it requires OS 10.4
(Tiger) to
run. I was told by the Apple rep that Tiger would run my OS 9
applications
on this machine
Ann,
As far as I'm aware, Tiger does NOT support OS 9 in any form. Mac OS
X up to somewhere around 10.3 or so WOULD run OS 9 apps in, basically,
emulation form in what was known as Classic. However, OS X 10.4 dropped
that provision, as far as I know. But, then again, if an Apple rep told
you
, 2006 3:03 PM
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: OS 9 Applications on Tiger
Ann,
As far as I'm aware, Tiger does NOT support OS 9 in any form. Mac OS
X up to somewhere around 10.3 or so WOULD run OS 9 apps in, basically,
emulation form in what was known as Classic. However, OS X 10.4
]
From: Sam Beard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 13:03:07 -0700
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: OS 9 Applications on Tiger
Ann,
As far as I'm aware, Tiger does NOT support OS 9 in any form. Mac OS
X up to somewhere around 10.3 or so WOULD run OS 9 apps in, basically
Hi, Ann:
I'm running FrameMaker 7.x under Classic on Tiger 10.4.8 on a Powerbook
Titanium 667mHz, 1GB RAM with no Tiger-specific problems. I can't
remember if the Tiger I installed on the new replacement hard drive
included OS 9, or if I dragged a System Folder for OS 9.22 from a backup
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sam Beard
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 3:03 PM
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: OS 9 Applications on Tiger
Ann,
As far as I'm aware, Tiger does NOT support OS 9 in any form. Mac OS
X up
, 2006 4:49 PM
To: Michael O'Neill; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: OS 9 Applications on Tiger
Michael and Scott,
This is intriguing to me. My understanding was that Classic, and
therefore OS 9, wouldn't run on any of the later machines, particularly
any Intel-based
13 matches
Mail list logo
