Thanks everyone who chimed in on this! I'll take these references
back to the table and see if we can settle this.
ps I'm delighted I'm right. Is that wrong? :)
On 2/18/08, Mike Wickham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Chicago Manual of Style shows this as the proper order:
Table of Contents
Assuming you mean that they're still going to be discrete lists within
the TOC, no, it shouldn't be a problem.
In the TOC, just import the LOF and LOT files as text insets.
Art
On Feb 19, 2008 11:52 AM, Deirdre Reagan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, now I have a problem.
We've decided to keep
Sorry, don't mean to be thick -- I'm still learning Framemaker!
How do I do this? I'm on Windows XP running FM 8.0.
I have the book open, with the TOC highlighted.
All other files are closed.
Thanks so much.
Deirdre
On 2/19/08, Art Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Assuming you mean that
Art Campbell wrote:
Assuming you mean that they're still going to be discrete lists within
the TOC, no, it shouldn't be a problem.
In the TOC, just import the LOF and LOT files as text insets.
Art
On Feb 19, 2008 11:52 AM, Deirdre Reagan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, now I have a
I don't want to import the entire file into the TOC.
I just want a TOC that looks like this:
Table of Contents
List of Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .LOF-1
List of Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .LOT-1
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . INTRO-1
and ect.
Thanks!
Open the TOC.
Scoll to the place where you want the LOF to appear.
File Import File filename.LOF and set the options as you'd like.
Then repeat the previous step for the LOT.
Art
On Feb 19, 2008 12:10 PM, Deirdre Reagan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, don't mean to be thick -- I'm still
Well, now I have a problem.
We've decided to keep the order TOC, LOF, LOT, and to put the LOF and
the LOT in the TOC.
Is there some way I can automate that? Or, since the LOF and the LOT
are automatically generated, do I have to do it by hand each time I
generate a TOC?
Thanks so much,
Why wouldn't you put the LOF and the LOT in the TOC? Do you include
the Index in the TOC?
-- Emily
At 02:46 PM 2/18/2008, Deirdre Reagan wrote:
Hi all:
My co-worker and I are debating about the order of the TOC, LOF and
LOT. I say they are all tables of content, and should come in the
order
Yes LOF and LOT are both examples of front matter, but so is a ToC.
IMHO, the only things (standard elements) that should come before the
ToC are the Cover and the Legal page (if not at the end). Anything else
will likely just be contrary to user expectations.
With that said, there ARE
The Chicago Manual of Style shows this as the proper order:
Table of Contents
List of Illustrations
List of Tables
Mike Wickham
___
You are currently subscribed to Framers as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send list messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
Doesn't anyone use LOT, TOC, and barrel, any more? G
My co-worker and I are debating about the order of the TOC, LOF and
LOT. I say they are all tables of content, and should come in the
order TOC, LOF, LOT (or LOT, LOF, I don't really mind, just TOC
first).
He says that LOF and LOT
11 matches
Mail list logo
