...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Gary Schnabl
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 2:13 AM
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Request Info on DocBook
Garnier Garnier wrote:
> Hello Listers,
>
> I am about to explore DocBook. I am sure so
Garnier Garnier wrote:
> Hello Listers,
>
> I am about to explore DocBook. I am sure some of the listers must be using it
> or have used it in the past. Could you please share your experience? Went
> through some of the details over the net and it seems a good tool to switch
> to but involves
I have used DocBook for many years. As a structure model, DocBook is robust
and met all our needs for documenting heavy equipment in 24 languages. It is
well developed and well supported.
Given the development work is done up front, some people learn quickly while
others struggle. On the developm
Art Campbell wrote:
> Gary,
> Hasn't 5.1 been released to fix the problems that 5.0 had? I was
> hearing about it, but don't use it (yet) so I haven't tracked it down.
>
> Art
>
Found this while searching for 5.1:
DocBook Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 15 April 2009
View: New views
Art Campbell wrote:
> Gary,
> Hasn't 5.1 been released to fix the problems that 5.0 had? I was
> hearing about it, but don't use it (yet) so I haven't tracked it down.
>
> Art
>
> Art Campbell
>
I did not know that 5.1 was available. The DTD nonnormative version of
5.0 was admittedly incomplet
Gary,
Hasn't 5.1 been released to fix the problems that 5.0 had? I was
hearing about it, but don't use it (yet) so I haven't tracked it down.
Art
Art Campbell
art.campb...@gmail.com
"... In my opinion, there's nothing in this world beats a '52
Vincent and a redheaded girl." -- Ri
Garnier Garnier wrote:
> Hello Listers,
>
> I am about to explore DocBook. I am sure some of the listers must be using it
> or have used it in the past. Could you please share your experience? Went
> through some of the details over the net and it seems a good tool to switch
> to but involves
