Sent: 2012-12-10-Monday 10:34
To: Alan Houser; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Running FrameMaker on Mac workstations
At 10:03 -0500 10/12/12, Alan Houser wrote:
>An interesting tidbit...if you check the properties of Apple's
PDF-format user manuals, you will still see FrameMaker
: 2012-12-10-Monday 10:34
To: Alan Houser; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Running FrameMaker on Mac workstations
At 10:03 -0500 10/12/12, Alan Houser wrote:
>An interesting tidbit...if you check the properties of Apple's
PDF-format user manuals, you will still see FrameMaker 6 an
At 10:03 -0500 10/12/12, Alan Houser wrote:
>An interesting tidbit...if you check the properties of Apple's PDF-format user
>manuals, you will still see FrameMaker 6 and 7 with surprising frequency.
I am still using it here, as it does all that I need. Trouble is, it's locking
me into OS X 10.4
Others have answered this question
pretty well. Just to add anecdotal experience, I and several other
FrameMaker consultants/trainers have been working almost
exclusively on the Mac platform for some time, using either
Parallels or VMware Fusion to run MacOS and W
Hi Dave,
Some answers:
1. The latest native FrameMaker version for Mac was 7 or 7.1.
2., 3. You run virtualization software like Parallels or Fusion on the Mac
so you can install Windows and Windows programs. Then you can run the any
version of FrameMaker that will run on Windows.
Rick
Rick Qu
> From: dave.st...@gdc4s.com
>
> Please help dispel my ignorance or refresh my memory. I use FrameMaker on a
> "PC," but I've read that some die-hard users of FrameMaker who have Mac
> workstations are still using it. So, as they might say in the City of New
> York, "Not for nothin', but . .
At 05:57 -0700 10/12/12, wrote:
>Please help dispel my ignorance or refresh my memory. I use FrameMaker on a
>"PC," but I've read that some die-hard users of FrameMaker who have Mac
>workstations are still using it. So, as they might say in the City of New
>York, "Not for nothin', but . . ."
