Don't make yourself crazy over this - it's common, and is a online
viewing problem that's been present in Adobe's Distiller for years. I
thought it was the nature of PDFs for a long while until I noticed
that PDFs created with RenderX XEP (what some writers I work with are
using to press from DITA
heat off me for not being able to
figure out what's going on.
So thanks for the info!
L.
From: Fred Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 8:51 AM
To: Doug; Chen, Loretta
Cc: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: Table ru
Doug wrote:
> In my experience the true test is whether the rules print
> normally...Acrobat has a reputation for not being able to draw lines
> well. If the hardcopy is fine, just ignore the inconsistent ruling.
Just to clarify: Acrobat's problems with line widths is on-screen
only, and it all
In my experience the true test is whether the rules print
normally...Acrobat has a reputation for not being able to draw lines
well. If the hardcopy is fine, just ignore the inconsistent ruling.
--Doug
On 11/29/07, Chen, Loretta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We just changed our tables fro
If it turns out the rules aren't just visual affects, but actually are
in the PDF, remember that it is possible for the rule thicknesses to
vary from machine to machine if custom ruling is used...
Also, Rick Quatro's Table Cleaner plug in is a great tool for tracking
down and resolving problems li
Loretta,
What you are probably seeing is a result of the screen - sometimes the
line triggers one row of pixels and sometimes two, making it look thicker.
When you increase the magnification all lines trigger two (or more rows)
and look the same.
If you move the image around on the screen do the