At 00:37 -0700 5/11/06, Graeme Forbes wrote:
you can easily set a default. I run Acro5, full version, and Acro7 Pro
(default), on the same machines, but the solution to having them cohabit
peacefully may be that Acro5 is set to open as a classic application.
Ditto here with Acrobat 5 and 6,
Dov and all:
This is a good time, though, to
repeat my warning that you should not attempt to have
either multiple versions of Acrobat, multiple versions
of Reader, and/or mixtures of Acrobat and Reader installed
on a given system. Although it is possible to coerce the
installers to do
Tina:
I would think it would be very difficult to get multiple
version working together that do not interfere with each other.
Difficult, but not impossible. Software manufacturers should not blame
their customers and put problems on their shoulders that can easily (or
difficultly) be
Dov wrote:
"The problems that I mention are more prevalent under Windows
than on Mac"
which sounds about right. But although
"even the Mac has issues with such parallel
installations. Some program must respond to double clicks
to open/process files from the user interface"
you can easily set a
At 00:37 -0700 5/11/06, Graeme Forbes wrote:
>you can easily set a default. I run Acro5, full version, and Acro7 Pro
>(default), on the same machines, but the solution to having them cohabit
>peacefully may be that Acro5 is set to open as a classic application.
Ditto here with Acrobat 5 and 6,
I would think it would be very difficult to get multiple
version working together that do not interfere with each other.
FrameMaker doesn't not 'touch' other applications. Acrobat
has to work with MS Word, Excel, plus a multitude of other
non-Microsoft and Adobe products. And not only work with