On 8 Jun 2021 at 15:25, Wendy McGovern wrote:
> I'm still a little skeptical, though, whether the new version actually
> "splits"
> the footnote like Word does and puts part of the note on the next page or
> whether the new Frame just moves the whole note to be on the same page as the
>
So which does it do? The first (like Word) or the second option Wendy describes?
Craig
Wendy McGovern wrote:
> I'm still a little skeptical, though, whether the new version actually
> "splits"
> the footnote like Word does and puts part of the note on the
On 9 Jun 2021 at 14:48, Craig Ede wrote:
> So which does it do? The first (like Word) or the second
> option Wendy describes?
Oh, sorry, my sententence contains plenty of ambigoutiy.
Fact is:
FM 16 (aka 2020) just moves the whole note to be on the same page as the
reference
number, leaving a
Klause Daube wrote: “Fact is:
FM 16...just moves the whole note to be on the same page as the reference
number, leaving a big ugly gap on the page.”
And it’s 2021. Extraordinary. It’s not as if Adobe doesn’t employ people who
know how to do footnotes — they work fine in InDesign. So I guess
Argh... Ghosts and legacies of last-century engineering design. InDesign's
composition engine was born smart, and kept evolving. ID overall has gotten
closer and closer to FM technical authoring and book tool set.
But, the cost of migrating individual authors, tech-publishing departments,
and
When I've had to wrestle with this issue, if there was time, and
willingness to cooperate, I'd try to work with the author to re-write or
re-order the material. Yes, madness, but doesn't page beauty someone's
justify it.
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021, 2:03 AM Klaus Daube wrote:
> On 8 Jun 2021 at 15:25,
