David Levy wrote:
I'm at the point where, if a client wants the work done in
Word, I build it in FM, PDF it, and then use an OCR program
to convert it to Word. The results are better than FM's
Save as feature.
shudder / OCR??? The PDF contains *real words*, not an *image* of the
Hi, Richard
Combs, Richard wrote:
David Levy wrote:
I'm at the point where, if a client wants the work done in
Word, I build it in FM, PDF it, and then use an OCR program
to convert it to Word. The results are better than FM's
Save as feature.
shudder / OCR??? The PDF contains *real
Syed Zaeem Hosain wrote:
Hmmm ... I would be surprised if he is using a true image
OCR program. I suspect a mis-speak! :)
Perhaps you're right. But in fact, there's no _other_ kind of OCR
program. OCR stands for optical character recognition. It's the
process of converting an _image_ or
Hi, Richard
Combs, Richard wrote:
Syed Zaeem Hosain wrote:
Hmmm ... I would be surprised if he is using a true image
OCR program. I suspect a mis-speak! :)
Perhaps you're right. But in fact, there's no _other_ kind of OCR
program. OCR stands for optical character recognition. It's the
David Levy wrote:
> I'm at the point where, if a client wants the work done in
> Word, I build it in FM, PDF it, and then use an OCR program
> to convert it to Word. The results are better than FM's
> "Save as" feature.
OCR??? The PDF contains *real words*, not an *image* of the
words!
Hi, Richard
Combs, Richard wrote:
> David Levy wrote:
>> I'm at the point where, if a client wants the work done in
>> Word, I build it in FM, PDF it, and then use an OCR program
>> to convert it to Word. The results are better than FM's
>> "Save as" feature.
>
> OCR??? The PDF contains
Syed Zaeem Hosain wrote:
> Hmmm ... I would be surprised if he is using a true "image"
> OCR program. I suspect a mis-speak! :)
Perhaps you're right. But in fact, there's no _other_ kind of OCR
program. OCR stands for "optical character recognition." It's the
process of converting an _image_
Hi, Richard
Combs, Richard wrote:
> Syed Zaeem Hosain wrote:
>
>> Hmmm ... I would be surprised if he is using a true "image"
>> OCR program. I suspect a mis-speak! :)
>
> Perhaps you're right. But in fact, there's no _other_ kind of OCR
> program. OCR stands for "optical character
