I think the key question is whether they're going to resuse it in the
future, even if they don't now.
If they're not planning on changes though, I agree with you; it'd be
more overhead with no payback.
Art
On 5/11/07, Pat Christenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a client who wants to move
Structured FM (regardless of the data model) can offer benefits with
regard to consistency and control. There have recently been a number of
threads on this subject. Whether DITA offers any specific advantages
over another data model is yet to be seen. Even though your client may
not seem to
I have a client who wants to move from Word to FrameMaker for their
training materials. Someone else told them they should go to
Structured FrameMaker/DITA. The training group has only one output
for their materials - print. They don't reuse the materials except to
revise them with
I think the key question is whether they're going to resuse it in the
future, even if they don't now.
If they're not planning on changes though, I agree with you; it'd be
more overhead with no payback.
Art
On 5/11/07, Pat Christenson wrote:
> I have a client who wants to move from Word to
Structured FM (regardless of the data model) can offer benefits with
regard to consistency and control. There have recently been a number of
threads on this subject. Whether DITA offers any specific advantages
over another data model is yet to be seen. Even though your client may
not seem to