: Graphics average weight
-- In Acrobat, select Document Reduce File Size. I haven't used this
much, but it shrunk a 4.2 MB file to 2.5 MB. Graphics quality may be
somewhat lower, but I'm not sure, since the PDF came from elsewhere.
I've tried this method and discovered it reduces some
:30:44 -0700
> Subject: RE: Graphics average weight
>
> >> -- In Acrobat, select Document > Reduce File Size. I haven't used this
> >> much, but it shrunk a 4.2 MB file to 2.5 MB. Graphics quality may be
> >> somewhat lower, but I'm not sure, since the PDF
A good way to reduce PDF file size without harming graphics resolution is
Document Examine Document, which finds a bunch of things that can be removed
from the document (hidden text, deleted or cropped content, etc.). It can also
remove metadata and bookmarks if you don't want them, and even
On 21/10/2010 4:14 PM, mathieu jacquet wrote:
Thank you Art,
No, I do not. Is there a special tool for optimizing PDFs?
Best regards,
Mathieu
From: art.campb...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:58:37 -0400
Subject: Re: Graphics average weight
To: bobi...@hotmail.com
CC: generic
A good way to reduce PDF file size without harming graphics resolution is
Document > Examine Document, which finds a bunch of things that can be removed
from the document (hidden text, deleted or cropped content, etc.). It can also
remove metadata and bookmarks if you don't want them, and even
Dear all,
what is the average weight in Ko of your screenshots and illustrations? My docs
are pretty heavy (up to 15-20 Mo), with graphics (mostly png) being around 15
Ko-70 Ko in average. That looks too much. What would the best solution be to
reduce their weight (in batch if possible)?
If I recall correctly, images that are copied into FM, rather than referenced,
make for larger PDFs.
Nadine
--- On Thu, 10/21/10, Combs, Richard richard.co...@polycom.com wrote:
From: Combs, Richard richard.co...@polycom.com
Subject: RE: Graphics average weight
To: mathieu jacquet bobi
as a deliverable. For the same set of
graphic images, the PDF file size is the same regardless of copying vs. pasting.
-Fred Ridder
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:01:54 -0700
From: generic...@yahoo.ca
Subject: RE: Graphics average weight
To: bobi...@hotmail.com; framers@lists.frameusers.com
detail. :-)
Here they are :).
Thank you all for your help,
Mathieu.
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:01:54 -0700
From: generic...@yahoo.ca
Subject: RE: Graphics average weight
To: bobi...@hotmail.com; framers@lists.frameusers.com;
richard.co...@polycom.com
If I recall correctly, images
Thank you Art,
No, I do not. Is there a special tool for optimizing PDFs?
Best regards,
Mathieu
From: art.campb...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:58:37 -0400
Subject: Re: Graphics average weight
To: bobi...@hotmail.com
CC: generic...@yahoo.ca; framers@lists.frameusers.com
: generic...@yahoo.ca
Subject: RE: Graphics average weight
To: bobi...@hotmail.com; framers@lists.frameusers.com;
richard.co...@polycom.com
If I recall correctly, images that are copied into FM, rather than
referenced, make for larger PDFs.
Nadine
--- On Thu, 10/21/10, Combs, Richard
Dear all,
what is the average weight in Ko of your screenshots and illustrations? My docs
are pretty heavy (up to 15-20 Mo), with graphics (mostly png) being around 15
Ko-70 Ko in average. That looks too much. What would the best solution be to
reduce their weight (in batch if possible)?
mathieu jacquet wrote:
> what is the average weight in Ko of your screenshots and illustrations? My
> docs are pretty heavy (up to 15-20 Mo), with graphics (mostly png) being
> around 15 Ko-70 Ko in average. That looks too much. What would the best
> solution be to reduce their weight (in batch
If I recall correctly, images that are copied into FM, rather than referenced,
make for larger PDFs.
Nadine
--- On Thu, 10/21/10, Combs, Richard wrote:
> From: Combs, Richard
> Subject: RE: Graphics average weight
> To: "mathieu jacquet" , "framers at
> li
as a deliverable. For the same set of
graphic images, the PDF file size is the same regardless of copying vs. pasting.
-Fred Ridder
> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:01:54 -0700
> From: generic668 at yahoo.ca
> Subject: RE: Graphics average weight
> To: bobitch at hotmail.
option.
> >
> > There are graphics gurus on the list (I'm not one of them)
> > who can probably offer useful advice once they understand
> > the question and have a little more detail. :-)
Here they are :).
Thank you all for your help,
Mathieu.
> Date: Thu, 21 Oct
Thank you Art,
No, I do not. Is there a special tool for optimizing PDFs?
Best regards,
Mathieu
> From: art.campbell at gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:58:37 -0400
> Subject: Re: Graphics average weight
> To: bobitch at hotmail.com
> CC: generic668 at ya
mathieu jacquet wrote:
> No, I do not. Is there a special tool for optimizing PDFs?
Here are some things you might experiment with to see which ones provide an
acceptable combination of size reduction and graphics quality:
-- In Distiller, try the Smallest File Size job options (a.k.a, Adobe
127
E-mail: alison.craig at ultrasonix.com
-Original Message-
From: framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Combs, Richard
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 1:50 PM
To: mathieu jacquet
Cc: framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE:
ards,
> Mathieu
>
>> From: art.campbell at gmail.com
>> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:58:37 -0400
>> Subject: Re: Graphics average weight
>> To: bobitch at hotmail.com
>> CC: generic668 at yahoo.ca; framers at lists.frameusers.com;
>> richard.combs at
:) ) job
> option.
>
>> >
>> > There are graphics gurus on the list (I'm not one of them)
>> > who can probably offer useful advice once they understand
>> > the question and have a little more detail. :-)
>
> Here they are :).
>
> Thank you
On 21/10/2010 4:14 PM, mathieu jacquet wrote:
>
> Thank you Art,
>
> No, I do not. Is there a special tool for optimizing PDFs?
>
> Best regards,
> Mathieu
>
>> From: art.campbell at gmail.com
>> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:58:37 -0400
>> Subject:
22 matches
Mail list logo
