never
encountered any issues with it.
TVB
From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Scott Prentice
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 6:56 PM
To: Mike
Cc: framers
Subject: Re: search with RegExp RE: Now OT, I suppose. RE: Adobe pricing
highlighting this use of
that feature.
Craig
From: mhoff...@adobe.com
To: i...@mikewickham.com; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: Now OT, I suppose. RE: Adobe pricing policies
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 20:18:57 +
Mike,
You are correct. That was my post. The point I
@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: search with RegExp RE: Now OT, I suppose. RE: Adobe pricing
policies
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 20:28:44 +
Mike,
I will verify the correct answer for you and post it here soon. Sorry that your
Q didn’t get answered. We had well over 100 Qs between chat and the Q
To: Craig Ede
Cc: Maxwell Hoffmann; framers
Subject: Re: search with RegExp RE: Now OT, I suppose. RE: Adobe pricing
policies
My question was ignored many times during the webinar. Do the search
enhancements include finding matches in included files? Currently, the only way
I can search for strings
From: Shlomo Perets shlo...@microtype.com
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com; craig...@hotmail.com
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 8:58 AM
Subject: RE: search with RegExp RE: Now OT, I suppose. RE: Adobe pricing
policies
I will demonstrate various techniques for marker management
By included files do you mean text insets?
If so .. I don't believe that a search will find anything in an inset
(certainly would be nice). Once way you can do that is to create a
special book that you use for authoring, which is different than the one
you use to create PDFs from. Add your
I don't buy that at all. DITA has major costs that are not offset
unless you have substantial opportunities for reuse and publish in
multiple languages.
There's no rational reason to spend money on low-value upgrades. Do a
cost-benefit analysis and know what you're paying for. At one old job
we
Adobe says it supports DocBook and various other things besides DITA:
http://www.adobe.com/products/framemakerxmlauthor/features.html
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 6:24 AM, Bernard Gagne bernyga...@rogers.com wrote:
That's great as long as you use DITA. We use DocBook so FrameMaker XML
Author (which
Adobe also says it does not support DocBook:
http://www.adobe.com/ca/products/framemakerxmlauthor/faq.html (see
What is the difference ...)
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Robert Lauriston rob...@lauriston.com wrote:
Adobe says it supports DocBook and various other things besides DITA:
8:41 AM
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Now OT, I suppose. RE: Adobe pricing policies
I don't have the original message handy, but I think the original poster was
saying that at least the last three FrameMaker releases have been on an
18-month cycle. We get a new version of FM every
of that
feature.
Craig
From: mhoff...@adobe.com
To: i...@mikewickham.com; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: Now OT, I suppose. RE: Adobe pricing policies
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 20:18:57 +
Mike,
You are correct. That was my post. The point I was making was that if you
subscribe for 2
://microtype.com
From: Craig Ede craig...@hotmail.com
Date: Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:38 PM
Subject: search with RegExp RE: Now OT, I suppose. RE: Adobe pricing
policies
To: Maxwell Hoffmann mhoff...@adobe.com, framers
framers@lists.frameusers.com
I'm especially excited about the search
That's great as long as you use DITA. We use DocBook so FrameMaker XML Author
(which should more appropriately be called FrameMaker DITA Author) is useless.
Oxygen and XMetal have nothing to fear.
Berny Gagne
Senior Technical Writer
Siemens Canada
On Thursday, January 23, 2014 8:28:02 AM,
I don't have the original message handy, but I think the original poster
was saying that at least the last three FrameMaker releases have been on
an 18-month cycle. We get a new version of FM every year and a half.
This was previously the case with Creative Suite software, too.
Mike Wickham
Hi Berny...
FM XML Author should work fine for DocBook (as well as full FM12
does). Have you seen or heard different?
...scott
On 1/24/14 6:24 AM, Bernard Gagne wrote:
That's great as long as you use DITA. We use DocBook so FrameMaker XML
Author (which should more appropriately be called
Hello Framers
It has been interesting and entertaining to read the various posts about
upgrades and pricing. Thanks to Syed for persisting with this. A few
statements that have been made raised my eyebrows somewhat:
"Three releases of FrameMaker in 18 months" - really? I must have missed
two
At 11:28 -0800 22/1/14, Syed Zaeem Hosain (syed.hos...@aeris.net) wrote:
The unhappy ones are probably the small users - like myself - who helped
FrameMaker become what it is and Adobe *clearly* does not care about us
anymore. That is unlike the founders of Frame Technology who I met many years
My guess is Adobe's goal in creating FrameMaker XML Author and pricing
it at $400 is to eliminate the cost savings incentive for structured
FrameMaker users to switch to Oxygen or XMetal instead of adding more
FM seats.
Also, at $400, I doubt if FrameMaker XML Author is going to be able to
Do XML editors generally support conditional text and content reuse?
Shmuel Wolfson
Technical Writer
052-763-7133
On 22-Jan-14 9:43 PM, Syed Zaeem Hosain (Syed.Hosain at aeris.net) wrote:
>> Also, at $400, I doubt if FrameMaker XML Author is going to be able to
>> compete with other XML editors
Maxwell Hoffman said:
For another viewpoint, Adobe was just named in the top 100 companies to work
for by Fortune. Our 2013 revenues considerably exceeded projections. So
somebody out there is happy with Adobe. ;-)
Perhaps. :) But, at what cost?
The unhappy ones are probably the small
At 07:49 -0800 22/1/14, Syed Zaeem Hosain (syed.hos...@aeris.net) wrote:
Financial success by large companies is not the only measure of success that
matters. It is why in my 35+ years of work, I have chosen to do many small
startups and try to only work for small companies. My current startup
Excellent point by Syed. Another point that is easy to miss in this
discussion: If all of Adobe's products had the level of quality control that
FrameMaker has (long-standing and new bugs, outdated and incomplete
documentation, etc.), Adobe certainly wouldn't be as successful as it is. In
my
Rick Quatro said:
Excellent point by Syed. Another point that is easy to miss in this
discussion: If all of Adobe's products had the level of quality control that
FrameMaker has (long-standing and new bugs, outdated and incomplete
documentation, etc.), Adobe certainly wouldn't be as
Maxwell Hoffman said:
> For another viewpoint, Adobe was just named in the top 100 companies to work
> for by Fortune. Our 2013 revenues considerably exceeded projections. So
> "somebody" out there is happy with Adobe. ;-)
Perhaps. :) But, at what cost?
The unhappy ones are probably the small
At 07:49 -0800 22/1/14, Syed Zaeem Hosain (Syed.Hosain at aeris.net) wrote:
>Financial success by large companies is not the only measure of success that
>matters. It is why in my 35+ years of work, I have chosen to do many small
>startups and try to only work for small companies. My current
Excellent point by Syed. Another point that is easy to miss in this
discussion: If all of Adobe's products had the level of quality control that
FrameMaker has (long-standing and new bugs, outdated and incomplete
documentation, etc.), Adobe certainly wouldn't be as successful as it is. In
my
Rick Quatro said:
> Excellent point by Syed. Another point that is easy to miss in this
> discussion: If all of Adobe's products had the level of quality control that
> FrameMaker has (long-standing and new bugs, outdated and incomplete
> documentation, etc.), Adobe certainly wouldn't be as
> Also, at $400, I doubt if FrameMaker XML Author is going to be able to
> compete with other XML editors out there. The idea is fantastic, but the cost
> needs to be around $100-150 a seat.
A list: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_XML_editors. Many licensed
and free versions listed
28 matches
Mail list logo
