If you are talking about JPEG 2000, I would agree.
I still find that adding annotations on a JPG (unless one uses no
compression), leaves artifacts, which are especially noticeable when
they get scaled.
If you are not scaling and not annotating directly on the image, then
JPG is probably not a bad
Grant Hogarth wrote:
(And yes, I agree that FM needs to improve it's handling of PNG
colors. FM10 seems to have eliminated most of that problem (in that
I've not noticed it in FM 10), but I've also not pushed the limits. (I
also save in indexed PNG, which may have something to do with it.)
If you are talking about JPEG 2000, I would agree.
I still find that adding annotations on a JPG (unless one uses no
compression), leaves artifacts, which are especially noticeable when
they get scaled.
If you are not scaling and not annotating directly on the image, then
JPG is probably not a bad
Grant Hogarth wrote:
> (And yes, I agree that FM needs to improve it's handling of PNG
> colors.? FM10 seems to have eliminated most of that problem (in that
> I've not noticed it in FM 10), but I've also not pushed the limits.? (I
> also save in indexed PNG, which may have something to do with
