y over 20
emails to me) I'll send a quick note to the list.
Bernard
Bernard Aschwanden
Publishing Technologies Expert
Publishing Smarter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.publishingsmarter.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marcus Carr
S
Rick Quatro wrote:
I agree with Marcus's excellent post, but one thing to consider on the
above point: even if you hire it out, try to learn as much about each
process, especially if you can devote some time to it. In today's job
climate, it pays to learn as much as you can about XML and relat
Items a) and c) will cost you money, but it's well spent. Do it properly
from the start and you'll only do it once - try to do it on the cheap and
you can spend the money next time around. I've seen it more times than I
could count in the 15 years that I've been involved with SGML and XML
conve
Dominick A. DeFlorio wrote:
We must move to structure to meet our future XML goal, but are
unfamiliar with both the transition and method to do so. We are also
unfamiliar with the possibilities and cost involved. We are merely
looking at all of the possibilities and the long term value for our
riginal Message-
Message: 9
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:31:43 -0500
From: "DeFlorio, Dominick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: "Real Life" Migration to Structured Doc
To: "Combs, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
C
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.com] On Behalf Of Paul Nagai
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 11:51 PM
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: "Real Life" Migration to Structured Doc
If you search google groups for the following:
Comparison of XML tools for writing documents
You
If you search google groups for the following:
Comparison of XML tools for writing documents
You will find a techwr-l conversation from about a year ago that might
be helpful.
___
You are currently subscribed to Framers as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To un
Hi Dominick,
I second Richard's question about your underlying assumptions (why is
XML a goal in and of itself?). That said, if you're committed to
structured authoring and want a reasonably inexpensive solution, I'd
strongly recommend that you take a look at DocFrame from Scriptorium
(Sarah
: "Real Life" Migration to Structured Doc
Dominick DeFlorio wrote:
> We are still trying to decide which direction to take toward
> structuring our document collection.
> Due to financial constraints, I am ambivalent about committing to a
> tack that may not enable us to
Dominick DeFlorio wrote:
> We are still trying to decide which direction to take toward
> structuring our document collection.
> Due to financial constraints, I am ambivalent about
> committing to a tack that may not enable us to become
> self-sufficient. However, I am still open to it.
At 8:05 am -0600 30/1/06, Spreadbury, David wrote:
>Take a look at Scriptorium (http://www.scriptorium.com/). Sarah O'Keefe,
>and her associate Sheila Loring, literally, wrote the book (The Complete
>Reference: FrameMaker 7). They provide both training and consulting in
>the use of FrameMaker, str
Hi Dominick,
I would look at both products with the assumption that your documentation is
already structured. In other words, the process of converting to structure
will not last forever, so you want to find out which product works best for
you once everything is structured. Once you determine
I can't answer in regards to Epic. It has been touted as an expensive
solution, but viable.
You mail mentions "...depending on price tag." , so I take it money is
an issue.
Take a look at Scriptorium (http://www.scriptorium.com/). Sarah O'Keefe,
and her associate Sheila Loring, literally, wrote t
13 matches
Mail list logo
