Eli Har-Even:
> . . . Does anyone have a use-case where having two sets of
> numbered lists has been useful? Is there any reason for having both sets?
No use case, but I can certainly imagine situations where a complex step
requires an embedded list, and where a list item includes a (hopefully
sh
--- Eli Har-Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Our FrameMaker templates have two sets of numbered
> lists, one set for steps (step1, step2, step3) and
another for lists (and list1, list2, list3).
> Visually, steps and lists look different, but in
> practice, authors use them interchangeably. I'm
con
At 17:20 +0200 30/4/07, Eli Har-Even wrote:
> I'm considering simplifying the template by eliminating one
>of the sets of tags. Does anyone have a use-case where having two sets of
>numbered lists has been useful? Is there any reason for having both sets?
There's always a general case for semanti
