On 15 May 2008, at 04:25, Jeremy H. Griffith wrote:
On Wed, 14 May 2008 22:05:47 -0400, Alan Houser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Which is worse? --
- You reply to a message on the list. Assuming that you are
replying to
the sender, you include information that is personal, privileged, or
Paul Findon wrote (in part):
Hedley is not asking for a reply-to-all. What he, I and, no doubt,
others want is reply-to-list. In other words, when you click your
Reply button, by default, messages are addressed to the list.
I've been using lists since 1993 and running several since
I believe this is the default Mailman set up, usually used to reduce
the risk of the email loops that Jeremy already mentioned.
Art
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Fred Ridder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Findon wrote (in part):
Hedley is not asking for a reply-to-all. What he, I and, no
Hedley is not asking for a reply-to-all. What he, I and, no doubt,
others want is reply-to-list. In other words, when you click your
Reply button, by default, messages are addressed to the list.
I've been using lists since 1993 and running several since 1996, and
Framers is the only list
At least one major email list that I subscribe to uses LISTSERV email
list management software. In this scheme, one posts messages to a
LISTSERV-powered server which in turn redistributes the posting to
all of the subscribers, either as individual email messages or in
digest format, comprising
On Wed, 14 May 2008 22:05:47 -0400, Alan Houser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Which is worse? --
- You reply to a message on the list. Assuming that you are replying to
the sender, you include information that is personal, privileged, or
inappropriate-for-public-consumption. Your reply goes to the
