Hi,
If you get an Intel Core 2 Duo (or Core 2 Quad) system, running at
2.6GHz or higher, with 4GB of DDR2 RAM and 7200rpm drives
(RAID 0 might
be a bit of overkill but easy enough to do), Windows Vista Business
64-bit, and something like an nVidia 9600GT card or better, you will
have
, Dr. Winfried
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 12:28 AM
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: Soliciting hardware recommendations
Hi,
If you get an Intel Core 2 Duo (or Core 2 Quad) system, running at
2.6GHz or higher, with 4GB of DDR2 RAM and 7200rpm drives
(RAID 0 might
If you get an Intel Core 2 Duo (or Core 2 Quad) system, running at
2.6GHz or higher, with 4GB of DDR2 RAM and 7200rpm drives
(RAID 0 might
be a bit of overkill but easy enough to do), Windows Vista Business
64-bit, and something like an nVidia 9600GT card or better, you will
have *more*
Hi,
> If you get an Intel Core 2 Duo (or Core 2 Quad) system, running at
> 2.6GHz or higher, with 4GB of DDR2 RAM and 7200rpm drives
> (RAID 0 might
> be a bit of overkill but easy enough to do), Windows Vista Business
> 64-bit, and something like an nVidia 9600GT card or better, you will
> have
ists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of
> Reng, Dr. Winfried
> Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 12:28 AM
> To: framers at lists.frameusers.com
> Subject: RE: Soliciting hardware recommendations
>
> Hi,
>
> > If you get an Intel Core 2 Duo (or Core 2 Quad) system, running at
> >
>> If you get an Intel Core 2 Duo (or Core 2 Quad) system, running at
>> 2.6GHz or higher, with 4GB of DDR2 RAM and 7200rpm drives
>> (RAID 0 might
>> be a bit of overkill but easy enough to do), Windows Vista Business
>> 64-bit, and something like an nVidia 9600GT card or better, you will
>>
Penny wise and pound foolish...
As a Mac diehard, I resisted buying a Windows machine for a very long
time. And then I bought a machine cobbled together by a neighbor, a
self-described computer expert. Bad idea. I have serious
intermittent problems creating PDFs from within FrameMaker.
Hi D...
I assume that you've tried running FM using Fusion on your Mac, and that
wasn't sufficient? I just started messing with this on a Mac Mini using
Fusion 2 .. I've got XP and Vista (and Ubuntu) running as
virtualizations, with FM7.2, 8, and 9 (among other things), and all
seems good to
based).
Z
-Original Message-
From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of D L Reynolds
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 9:20 AM
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Soliciting hardware recommendations
Penny wise and pound foolish
First of all, you folks are the best. Within minutes of posting, I
was getting helpful responses.
Some of you have suggested I run Windows on my beloved Mac. I've been
hesitant to do that, fearful that it might be buggy or cranky in some
way. From what I'm hearing, that isn't the case. So,
I am running TCS in VMWare Fusion on a 2.8 GHz Mac. It works great.
Rock solid. Crashes less than most pure Windows machines I've used. In
fact, I don't think Windows has ever crashed. Frame has a few times,
but the patches fixed that.
You can try most of this before making a commitment.
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of D L Reynolds
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 11:54 AM
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Soliciting hardware recommendations
First of all, you folks are the best. Within minutes of posting, I
was getting helpful responses.
Some of you
Lots o' marketing to wade through:
http://www.apple.com/macosx/what-is-macosx/compatibility.html
There are other ways to do this (Wine), but Parallels is plug-and-play:
http://parallels-desktop.for-mac.com/
As a Parallels user, I'd say try VMware Fusion. Parallels works, and
Penny wise and pound foolish...
As a Mac diehard, I resisted buying a Windows machine for a very long
time. And then I bought a machine cobbled together by a neighbor, a
self-described "computer expert." Bad idea. I have serious
intermittent problems creating PDFs from within FrameMaker.
Hi D...
I assume that you've tried running FM using Fusion on your Mac, and that
wasn't sufficient? I just started messing with this on a Mac Mini using
Fusion 2 .. I've got XP and Vista (and Ubuntu) running as
virtualizations, with FM7.2, 8, and 9 (among other things), and all
seems good to
based).
Z
-Original Message-
From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of D L Reynolds
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 9:20 AM
To: framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Soliciting hardware recommendations
Penny wise and pound
First of all, you folks are the best. Within minutes of posting, I
was getting helpful responses.
Some of you have suggested I run Windows on my beloved Mac. I've been
hesitant to do that, fearful that it might be buggy or cranky in some
way. From what I'm hearing, that isn't the case. So,
I am running TCS in VMWare Fusion on a 2.8 GHz Mac. It works great.
Rock solid. Crashes less than most pure Windows machines I've used. In
fact, I don't think Windows has ever crashed. Frame has a few times,
but the patches fixed that.
You can try most of this before making a commitment.
Hi, Donna:
You can postpone buying Windows by installing Windows 7 Release
Candidate 1 public beta. I'm using this with Fusion 2 and TCS2 on a
2.4gHz MacBook Pro running OS X 10.5.7 (latest update to "Leopard") No
significant problems in FM 9.x and Acrobat 9.x in the TCS2. Initially
I had
[mailto:framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of D L Reynolds
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 11:54 AM
To: framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Soliciting hardware recommendations
First of all, you folks are the best. Within minutes of posting, I
was getting helpful responses.
Some
> Lots o' marketing to wade through:
> http://www.apple.com/macosx/what-is-macosx/compatibility.html
>
> There are other ways to do this (Wine), but Parallels is plug-and-play:
> http://parallels-desktop.for-mac.com/
As a Parallels user, I'd say try VMware Fusion. Parallels works, and
21 matches
Mail list logo