John,
How can SnagIt capture an image at a higher resolution than what the screen
is set to? A 20 screen at 1280 x 1024, for example, is 96 DPI. How do you
get 200 DPI out of that?
Diane
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Sgammato
Sent:
Emmy,
Why don't you just use the distiller that comes with FM? It's on the Frame
CD. What happened to the copy of Acrobat you were using? If you still have
it, why not keep on using it?
I have a few thoughts about your penny-wise, pound-foolish purchasing
department, but I don't think most of
Alan,
I think he is using an anchored frame because there is a line in it that
goes all the way across the page.
Um, just an FYI, Graeme has been on this list for at least 5 years that I
know of. I kinda sorta think he knows how to use FM pretty well... :-)
Graeme,
How about putting the frame
When you capture a 96dpi image at higher resolution, you will never see detail
that isn't there (of course) but you can do more with the image because your
OWN image of the image is capable of showing greater resolution. You can look
at it as if your high-res image capture dices the existing
Pete...
Several important rules of thumb here:
1. Never save screen shots as jpg files, especially highly-compressed
ones! They will not look nearly as good as *.bmp files. JPEG
compression will soften the images so that they don't look real, like
they do on the screen when viewed directly.
Emmy Aricioglu wrote (in part):
The purchasing people also told me that Adobe told
them that PDF Converter does work with Frame. This is
what I am trying to confirm. When I open PDF
Converter, it is not able to find the .fm files. So
how can it work with Frame?
I think you've got a
Or in other words, increasing the print resolution uses interpolation
to add pixels where there were none before. This can be of benefit for
images with screen text and so on.
Cheers
Alan
On 3/02/2008, at 3:17 AM, John Sgammato wrote:
When you capture a 96dpi image at higher resolution,
On 2/02/2008, at 11:08 PM, Diane Gaskill wrote:
Alan,
Um, just an FYI, Graeme has been on this list for at least 5 years
that I
know of. I kinda sorta think he knows how to use FM pretty
well... :-)
Alright Diane, pulling my head in now.
Cheers
Alan
___
You are currently subscribed to Framers as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send list messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or visit
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com
So a question is what format, JPG, BMP, PNG, GIF saves the cleanest picture?
Personally, I would not use JPEG as it tends to artifact round the type,
making the image harder to read.
PNG or TIFF would be my first choices, GIF as a third choice depending on
the required color depth.
David
Hi Graeme,
I'm not certain why you are using an anchored frame to separate your
paragraphs. Why not just add space between them, then you can specify
which paragraphs need to a "keep with next" setting. This does away
with the extra paragraph between each text paragraph.
These setting are
Hi Pete,
On 2/02/2008, at 10:53 AM, Pete Rourke wrote:
> Here is another newbie question.
>
> FM8 - XP (importing into anchored frames)
>
> I am using Snagit (default image resolution 96dpi, and saving
> as .jpg) to
> capture screenshots for a end user manual which assumes the user needs
>
John,
How can SnagIt capture an image at a higher resolution than what the screen
is set to? A 20" screen at 1280 x 1024, for example, is 96 DPI. How do you
get 200 DPI out of that?
Diane
-Original Message-
From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-bounces at
Emmy,
Why don't you just use the distiller that comes with FM? It's on the Frame
CD. What happened to the copy of Acrobat you were using? If you still have
it, why not keep on using it?
I have a few thoughts about your penny-wise, pound-foolish purchasing
department, but I don't think most of
Alan,
I think he is using an anchored frame because there is a line in it that
goes all the way across the page.
Um, just an FYI, Graeme has been on this list for at least 5 years that I
know of. I kinda sorta think he knows how to use FM pretty well... :-)
Graeme,
How about putting the frame
When you capture a 96dpi image at higher resolution, you will never see detail
that isn't there (of course) but you can do more with the image because your
OWN image of the image is capable of showing greater resolution. You can look
at it as if your high-res image capture dices the existing
Emmy Aricioglu wrote (in part):
> The purchasing people also told me that Adobe told
> them that PDF Converter does work with Frame. This is
> what I am trying to confirm. When I open PDF
> Converter, it is not able to find the .fm files. So
> how can it work with Frame?
I think you've got a
> So a question is what format, JPG, BMP, PNG, GIF saves the cleanest picture?
Personally, I would not use JPEG as it tends to artifact round the type,
making the image harder to read.
PNG or TIFF would be my first choices, GIF as a third choice depending on
the required color depth.
David
Thanks Dennis,
I am importing by reference, I remember now setting that at the beginning of
the project.
The 8MB is the size of the images in the folders total. (the Snagit images)
There are 23 files in the book, including TOC, LOF, List of Tables, Index,
Glossary, the largest of which
20 matches
Mail list logo
