Footnote issues in FM 7.2

Hi: My rig is FM 7.2 b144 running on Vista Business. I do scholarly publishing. Footnotes on the bottom of the page in FM is an issue that I have raised both within this list and with Adobe (no reply from the latter). I do not believe it is a train smash to have a single footnote on the

Re: Footnote issues in FM 7.2

Hi Rob, My current gripe is the footnote line that sometimes appears and sometimes does not. Fixing that seems to require putting the cursor in the footnote and formatting manually with the enter key. Usually this is just a screen display problem. Press Control+L and the line should

RE: Footnote issues in FM 7.2

Shell, Robert wrote: Use the default footnote para format name in that same box. That seems to trigger the footnote separator line (see below) more regularly than if you used something else. Maybe this is just superstition. Of course you can then change the footnote format to whatever

R6002 - Floating Point Not Loaded!

Hi, I downloaded an xml file from our server and tried to open it with framemaker (v.8), the content is there but when I look unto its structure view this error prompts in: Runtime Error! R6002 -floating point not loaded Can anybody explain me anything

Footnote issues in FM 7.2

Hi: My rig is FM 7.2 b144 running on Vista Business. I do scholarly publishing. Footnotes on the bottom of the page in FM is an issue that I have raised both within this list and with Adobe (no reply from the latter). I do not believe it is a train smash to have a single footnote on the

Footnote issues in FM 7.2

Hi Rob, > My current gripe is the footnote line that sometimes appears and sometimes > does not. Fixing that seems to require putting the cursor in the footnote > and formatting manually with the enter key. Usually this is just a screen display problem. Press Control+L and the line should

Footnote issues in FM 7.2

Shell, Robert wrote: > Use the default "footnote" para format name in that same box. That seems to > trigger the footnote separator line (see below) more regularly than if you > used something else. Maybe this is just superstition. > > Of course you can then change the footnote format to

Single sourcing 2 manuals and one help

I have a somewhat similar monster project. Here's what I do: There are two versions of the manual, one with the full suite, and one without a module. Most of that module's info is covered in a few chapters, so I have two books to control which chapters are included. In the common chapters, there

Single sourcing 2 manuals and one help

Verner, I think your issue may be easy to solve.? But I'd try a couple of things: 1) (optimal if it works)? You can exclude chapters from your webWorks project so that your online help works. And theory is that you can use WebWorks to define what variables are showing and which are not.?