Experiment by making changes to the source.
For instance, insert Pulse Software before the word "Pulse", and PDF it
again. Observe the results. If the new words display fine, delete
everything after them and PDF it again. Observe the results.
You might be able to fix it, even if you might
At 16:46 -0400 11/9/20, Lin Sims wrote:
>This is only happening with 2 entries in the entire TOC. In the TOC, they
>look identical to all the other entries in the TOC. I've checked the
>paragraph tags in both the original files and the TOC files and they are
>the same. But in the PDF created from
At 14:13 -0500 12/9/20, Peter Gold wrote:
>...You can see my long memory as evidenced by recalling the automatic
>replacement of InterLeaf.
Oh wow, the Echoes of Times Past! :-) Interleaf: the app that required one
full-time 'administrator' per five user seats.
>This reminds me of something a
Hi, Lin:
AHA! It's a secret plot of some kind. I remember there was a time long ago,
when FM's auto-correct would replace "InterLeaf" or some other proprietary
competitor, with "FrameMaker."
The word-spacing computation might have a rounding error when it encounters
specific glyph combinations
TOCs are generated, so perhaps there's some indicator in the file or the
properties it assigns to content, that makes the PDF conversion processors
work differently. Obviously your results prove that the different routes to
PDF do work differently. Just wondering in your copious free time if
Peter
>
> Seriously, I'm sure you have tried changing the source, say, with a
> different word, or if it's a text variable try plain text, or is a
> character tag applied, or if it's a corporate-name font, swap it, etc. Is
> the font customized to apply special kerning or spacing to specific glyph
Spellcheck did indeed used to replace Interleaf with FrameMaker, but I
don't think it does anymore.
When it converts from Frame to PDF, that will make the link unclickable.
Also, I really don't want to have to apply a character tag to text created
in a generated document every time I regenerate
Well, now that you've discovered the exact pathway to that creates the
error, of course you're going to report it, so it gets on the list of fixes
needed. You can see my long memory as evidenced by recalling the automatic
replacement of InterLeaf.
This reminds me of something a little longer
I dunno. I mean, obviously the problem lies with the PDF generation, but I
suspect the fact that it messed up the one word (twice!), but only in the
TOC is not going to be enough for anyone to figure out what the issue is.
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 3:14 PM Peter Gold
wrote:
> Well, now that
There were two markers in the source paragraphs, one for the TOC xref link
and one for an Index marker. I moved the Index marker. No good.
There was a hard space between the word Pulse and the word Software. I took
it out and replaced it with a regular space. Also no good.
I deleted and RETYPED
Rounding error?
Damn. I got to be special again.
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 10:28 PM Peter Gold
wrote:
> IMO, a rounding error in the Save As > PDF vs Print > PDF, from your
> assiduous testing and reporting, seems the most likely.
>
--
Lin Sims
IMO, a rounding error in the Save As > PDF vs Print > PDF, from your
assiduous testing and reporting, seems the most likely.
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020, 9:13 PM Lin Sims wrote:
> There were two markers in the source paragraphs, one for the TOC xref link
> and one for an Index marker. I moved the
12 matches
Mail list logo
