Interchange vs Analysis

2006-02-02 Thread mc...@allette.com.au
Bernard wrote: > I generally have to agree with what is written below, but I have to take a > minor exception on (a) regarding 'the line that you can do it with DITA or > DocBook'. Out of the box does a good job, but unfortunately the 'good job' > is at scaring people away. I consider DITA to be

RE: Interchange vs. Analysis

2006-02-01 Thread Daniel Emory
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I consider DITA to be an interchange format. If two > organisations can figure out how to convert their own structure > to and from DITA, they can freely exchange data. Add five more > organisations and impose the same requirement on them and everyone can exchange dat

Interchange vs. Analysis

2006-02-01 Thread Daniel Emory
--- mcarr at allette.com.au wrote: > I consider DITA to be an interchange format. If two > organisations can figure out how to convert their own structure > to and from DITA, they can freely exchange data. Add five more > organisations and impose the same requirement on them and everyone can exchan

Interchange vs Analysis

2006-02-01 Thread mcarr
Bernard wrote: > I generally have to agree with what is written below, but I have to take a > minor exception on (a) regarding 'the line that you can do it with DITA or > DocBook'. Out of the box does a good job, but unfortunately the 'good job' > is at scaring people away. I consider DITA to be