Subject: Re: More like a flicker than a Blaze
Truthfully, I'd use Oxygen rather than Blaze for an XHTML editor. Or
I'd use a couple of other apps, which even when taken as a group are
less expensive than would be Blaze. And have a learning curve that
isn't as steep. The requirement to design isn't
a flicker than a Blaze
Truthfully, I'd use Oxygen rather than Blaze for an XHTML editor. Or
I'd use a couple of other apps, which even when taken as a group are
less expensive than would be Blaze. And have a learning curve that
isn't as steep. The requirement to design isn't one that I would
FM does have HTML output via reference page mapping and with DITA has
the ability to take content anywhere (though admittedly with
additional technology involvement). So it's not quite just print and
PDF that you get from FM as a standalone app, but HTML and XML as
well. But yes, FM is primarily
, 2008 7:02 PM
To: Hedley Finger; Frame Users
Subject: Re: More like a flicker than a Blaze
Truthfully, I'd use Oxygen rather than Blaze for an XHTML editor. Or
I'd use a couple of other apps, which even when taken as a group are
less expensive than would be Blaze. And have a learning curve
Of
> quills at airmail.net
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 7:02 PM
> To: Hedley Finger; Frame Users
> Subject: Re: More like a flicker than a Blaze
>
> Truthfully, I'd use Oxygen rather than Blaze for an XHTML editor. Or
> I'd use a couple of other apps, which even when taken
FM does have HTML output via reference page mapping and with DITA has
the ability to take content anywhere (though admittedly with
additional technology involvement). So it's not quite just print and
PDF that you get from FM as a standalone app, but HTML and XML as
well. But yes, FM is primarily
They gotta start somewhere!
Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hedley Finger
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 6:55 PM
To: Frame Users
Subject: More like a flicker than a Blaze
Blaze the FrameMaker killer? Don't make me laugh.
What
Truthfully, I'd use Oxygen rather than Blaze for an XHTML editor. Or
I'd use a couple of other apps, which even when taken as a group are
less expensive than would be Blaze. And have a learning curve that
isn't as steep. The requirement to design isn't one that I would give
to all authors,
They gotta start somewhere!
Rick
-Original Message-
From: framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Hedley Finger
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 6:55 PM
To: Frame Users
Subject: More like a flicker than a Blaze
Blaze
Truthfully, I'd use Oxygen rather than Blaze for an XHTML editor. Or
I'd use a couple of other apps, which even when taken as a group are
less expensive than would be Blaze. And have a learning curve that
isn't as steep. The requirement to design isn't one that I would give
to all authors,
You'd be better off using Flare for that than Blaze.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Hedley Finger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Blaze the FrameMaker killer? Don't make me laugh.
P.S. But if I want an advanced XHTML editor for my web site, this
baby will do.
--
Bill Swallow
HATT List
Blaze the FrameMaker killer? Don't make me laugh.
What about a named style for everything? What about smart
cross-references? What about variables? What about advanced search
and replace for anything? What about diagnostic reports?
XHTML, not even XML. No DITA.
Adobe will be able to
You'd be better off using Flare for that than Blaze.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Hedley Finger
wrote:
>
> Blaze the FrameMaker killer? Don't make me laugh.
>
> P.S. But if I want an advanced XHTML editor for my web site, this
> baby will do.
--
Bill Swallow
HATT List Owner
WWP-Users
Blaze the FrameMaker killer? Don't make me laugh.
What about a named style for everything? What about smart
cross-references? What about variables? What about advanced search
and replace for anything? What about diagnostic reports?
XHTML, not even XML. No DITA.
Adobe will be able to
14 matches
Mail list logo
