OS X PDF creation

2006-01-15 Thread Paul Findon
On 12 Jan 2006, at 17:38, William Herr wrote: > One can see why Adobe may be losing motivation to support OS X. Now if > just > Pages could grow up quickly ? but I know this is a pipe dream. I was disappointed by the newly announced Pages 2 because Apple could have done a lot more with it in th

Re: OS X PDF creation

2006-01-15 Thread Paul Findon
On 12 Jan 2006, at 17:38, William Herr wrote: One can see why Adobe may be losing motivation to support OS X. Now if just Pages could grow up quickly – but I know this is a pipe dream. I was disappointed by the newly announced Pages 2 because Apple could have done a lot more with it in the l

OS X PDF creation

2006-01-13 Thread Paul Findon
On 12 Jan 2006, at 17:38, William Herr wrote: > I just discovered the Folder Actions capability. This lets you assign a > canned script to a folder. One of those is convert Postscript to pdf. > > Does anyone use this routinely Like Apple, I use Distiller. > If it is robust then for a basic autho

OS X PDF creation

2006-01-13 Thread Steve Rickaby
At 9:38 am -0800 12/1/06, William Herr wrote: >I just discovered the Folder Actions capability. This lets you assign a >canned script to a folder. One of those is convert Postscript to pdf. > >Does anyone use this routinely? > >If it is robust then for a basic author like me, why do I need acrobat

Re: OS X PDF creation

2006-01-13 Thread Paul Findon
On 12 Jan 2006, at 17:38, William Herr wrote: I just discovered the Folder Actions capability. This lets you assign a canned script to a folder. One of those is convert Postscript to pdf. Does anyone use this routinely Like Apple, I use Distiller. If it is robust then for a basic author lik

Re: OS X PDF creation

2006-01-13 Thread Steve Rickaby
At 9:38 am -0800 12/1/06, William Herr wrote: >I just discovered the Folder Actions capability. This lets you assign a >canned script to a folder. One of those is convert Postscript to pdf. > >Does anyone use this routinely? > >If it is robust then for a basic author like me, why do I need acrobat

Re: OS X PDF creation

2006-01-12 Thread A
William Herr said: > I just discovered the Folder Actions capability. This lets you assign > a > canned script to a folder. One of those is convert Postscript to pdf. > > Does anyone use this routinely? > > If it is robust then for a basic author like me, why do I need > acrobat? The only reasons

OS X PDF creation

2006-01-12 Thread A
William Herr said: > I just discovered the Folder Actions capability. This lets you assign > a > canned script to a folder. One of those is convert Postscript to pdf. > > Does anyone use this routinely? > > If it is robust then for a basic author like me, why do I need > acrobat? The only reasons

OS X PDF creation

2006-01-12 Thread William Herr
I just discovered the Folder Actions capability. This lets you assign a canned script to a folder. One of those is convert Postscript to pdf. Does anyone use this routinely? If it is robust then for a basic author like me, why do I need acrobat? One can see why Adobe may be losing motivation to

OS X PDF creation

2006-01-12 Thread William Herr
I just discovered the Folder Actions capability. This lets you assign a canned script to a folder. One of those is convert Postscript to pdf. Does anyone use this routinely? If it is robust then for a basic author like me, why do I need acrobat? One can see why Adobe may be losing motivation to