Ooops! I just caught a typo, an omission that reverses the meaning.
It's embedded in the body below, marked with *
>Thanks Peter!
You're welcome.
> i'll take some time to go over this carefully, but this will be a great help
> to me!
> cheers
> Mulholland
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008
A drop in the pond on this runaway thread -
For the documents I produce, there is no way that InDesign could handle the
work of Frame. That would be a real nightmare. In other words, they
*cannot*do each other´s jobs.
I tend to be a meticulous user of Frame, and all of those features missing
Well said, Jeremy!
Seraphim
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Jeremy H. Griffith [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 08:46:29 -0700, Dov Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hardly see how your request is related to natural
justice any more or less than a request to also allow
Am 12.09.2008 um 00:17 schrieb Peter Gold:
Hi, Dov:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Dov Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be very clear, although designed as a replacement for PageMaker,
InDesign
was certainly not designed by Adobe to be a replacement for
FrameMaker.
Yes, over time
Graeme,
Don't count on getting that extra activation. The EULA is quite clear
in terms of how many systems - two - you may simultaneously install and
activate simultaneously and that you may legally only execute on one of
those at any time. I hardly see how your request is related to natural
at the same time. That is
the solution, not a policy that fails to keep up with the needs of the customer
base.
ymmv, etc
john
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Dov Isaacs
Sent: Fri 9/12/2008 11:46 AM
To: framers; Graeme R Forbes
Subject: RE: InDesign
R Forbes
Subject: RE: InDesign as a replacement for Framemaker
Adobe (and many other companies) must learn that many writers use
products on different computers at different times, and their approach
puts hurdles in the way of honest customers. There must be a
technological way to prevent the same
of Dov Isaacs
Sent: Fri 9/12/2008 11:46 AM
To: framers; Graeme R Forbes
Subject: RE: InDesign as a replacement for Framemaker
Graeme,
Don't count on getting that extra activation. The EULA is quite clear
in terms of how many systems - two - you may simultaneously install and
activate
Regarding the need to run Frame on multiple computers and manage
licenses: what about running Frame from a Citrix server? Is this an
option that Adobe supports for large installations?
Just curious,
Martin
Martin R. Smith
www.golehtek.com
___
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 1:13 PM
To: framers
Subject: RE: InDesign as a replacement for Framemaker
Regarding the need to run Frame on multiple computers and manage
licenses: what about running Frame from a Citrix server
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 08:46:29 -0700, Dov Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hardly see how your request is related to natural
justice any more or less than a request to also allow simultaneous
activation of the same license of FrameMaker on computers used by other
members of your family.
rant
To be very clear, although designed as a replacement for PageMaker, InDesign
was certainly not designed by Adobe to be a replacement for FrameMaker.
Yes, over time a number of FrameMaker features have been incorporated into
InDesign, but unless you are using none of FrameMaker's structured
Hi, Dov:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Dov Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be very clear, although designed as a replacement for PageMaker, InDesign
was certainly not designed by Adobe to be a replacement for FrameMaker.
Yes, over time a number of FrameMaker features have been
The only comment I will make is that the support is very different and
that you cannot simply replace FrameMaker with InDesign if you are using
FrameMaker's structured tools.
- Dov
-Original Message-
From: Peter Gold
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 3:17 PM
Hi, Dov:
On
14 matches
Mail list logo
