Re: why view on phone WAS: online FrameMaker 12 Documentation totally revamped

2014-12-16 Thread Writer
I think Google safety glasses would be a better idea. That way, you kill two birds with one stone: information and safety. =D Oh, and a third benefit: hands free. Nadine From: Craig Ede craig...@hotmail.com To: framers@lists.frameusers.com Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 1:28 PM

Re: why view on phone WAS: online FrameMaker 12 Documentation totally revamped

2014-12-16 Thread Robert Lauriston
Nobody walks around while using FrameMaker. My guess is they chose Responsive HTML over WebHelp for the same reason they dropped topics, used larger type and screen shots, added page breaks, and posted a URL to pages not visible to the public. On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Craig Ede

RE: why view on phone WAS: online FrameMaker 12 Documentation totally revamped

2014-12-16 Thread Craig Ede
] On Behalf Of Robert Lauriston Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 12:48 PM To: framers@lists.frameusers.com Subject: Re: why view on phone WAS: online FrameMaker 12 Documentation totally revamped Nobody walks around while using FrameMaker. My guess is they chose Responsive HTML over WebHelp

Re: why view on phone WAS: online FrameMaker 12 Documentation totally revamped

2014-12-16 Thread Robert Lauriston
Sure, it makes sense to generate all of the output formats and make them available as samples. But choosing Responsive HTML instead of WebHelp as the format for the primary copy of the help on adobe.com just serves to highlight its limitations. On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Craig Ede

RE: why view on phone WAS: online FrameMaker 12 Documentation totally revamped

2014-12-16 Thread Fred Ridder
...@lists.frameusers.com [mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Robert Lauriston Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 12:48 PM To: framers@lists.frameusers.com Subject: Re: why view on phone WAS: online FrameMaker 12 Documentation totally revamped Nobody walks around while using

RE: why view on phone WAS: online FrameMaker 12 Documentation totally revamped

2014-12-16 Thread Syed Zaeem Hosain (syed.hos...@aeris.net)
Acrobat Distiller 11.0 (Windows). Z From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com [mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Fred Ridder Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 12:07 PM To: Craig Ede; framers@lists.frameusers.com Subject: RE: why view on phone WAS: online FrameMaker 12

RE: why view on phone WAS: online FrameMaker 12 Documentation totally revamped

2014-12-16 Thread Craig, Alison
; framers@lists.frameusers.com Subject: RE: why view on phone WAS: online FrameMaker 12 Documentation totally revamped I'm curious about one thing (well, more than just one; but one thing in the current context...): Has Adobe ever actually said that they use FrameMaker produce the FrameMaker

Re: why view on phone WAS: online FrameMaker 12 Documentation totally revamped

2014-12-16 Thread Robert Lauriston
Microsoft reportedly didn't use FrameMaker or RoboHelp to create online help: http://www.techwr-l.com/archives/0308/techwhirl-0308-00155.html#.VJCxcydg6iM Microsoft Press has used FrameMaker for some books and probably still does. They did the MMoS4 in InDesign.