Third-party or "out of the box" plugins [was "re:

2007-02-26 Thread Peter Ring
With a bit of duct-tape, Excel worksheets, and Python scripts, the future is now. We use 'out-of-band' index entries to produce back-of-the-book indexes. The index is authored separately from the body text, using simple Excel worksheets as the exchange format, and associated to the body text

Re: Third-party or out of the box plugins [was re:

2007-02-25 Thread Peter Ring
With a bit of duct-tape, Excel worksheets, and Python scripts, the future is now. We use 'out-of-band' index entries to produce back-of-the-book indexes. The index is authored separately from the body text, using simple Excel worksheets as the exchange format, and associated to the body text

Third-party or "out of the box" plugins [was "re:

2007-02-25 Thread mc...@allette.com.au
Eric Dunn wrote: > Now what exactly is the difference between "hunt and peck" and "drill". Drilling through a graphical user interface would involve pointing at hot spots to get to the subsystem of interest, then working from a list of commonly required process - Servicing, Repair Procedures,

Re: Third-party or out of the box plugins [was re:

2007-02-24 Thread mcarr
Eric Dunn wrote: Now what exactly is the difference between hunt and peck and drill. Drilling through a graphical user interface would involve pointing at hot spots to get to the subsystem of interest, then working from a list of commonly required process - Servicing, Repair Procedures, etc.

Re: Third-party or out of the box plugins [was re: Frame's future]

2007-02-23 Thread eric . dunn
Marcus Carr [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 02/22/2007 10:46:17 PM: For our mechanically gifted friend, I'd be inclined to provide a graphic interface and a touch screen that let him drill to the warp drive than compel him to hunt and peck on a toughened keyboard. An index may have its place, but it's

Third-party or "out of the box" plugins [was "re: Frame's future"]

2007-02-23 Thread Marcus Carr
Hedley Finger wrote: > The original discussion was, generally, about what Adobe needed to do > to find out what functionality their customers would need in the > future. > > I attempted to make the point that a study of the third-party plugins > would indicate to Adobe the gaps in FrameMaker's

Third-party or "out of the box" plugins [was "re: Frame's future"]

2007-02-23 Thread hedley.fin...@myob.com
Marcus, Marcus, Marcus: > > I attempted to make the point that a study of the third-party plugins > > would indicate to Adobe the gaps in FrameMaker's functionality that > > they need to address, and chose indexing plugins as an example where > > there are many independent plugins to improve this

Third-party or "out of the box" plugins [was "re: Frame's future"]

2007-02-23 Thread Marcus Carr
hedley.finger at myob.com wrote: > Marcus, Marcus, Marcus: Hedley, Hedley, Hedley... :-) > I'm surprised that you of all people should associate functionality > with presentation. It's a bit similar to separating format from > content. 8^) And I'm surprised that you equate indexes only with

Third-party or "out of the box" plugins [was "re: Frame's future"]

2007-02-23 Thread hedley.fin...@myob.com
Marcus^3: The example of the Turbo Tarburner was chosen with care. Even as we bicker, a major automotive manufacturer is implementing an on-demand customised workshop manual. The mechanic will simply enter the car's body number or VIN or whatever, and a custom manual for just the equipment

Third-party or "out of the box" plugins [was "re: Frame's future"]

2007-02-23 Thread Marcus Carr
H4y^3, hedley.finger at myob.com wrote: > The example of the Turbo Tarburner was chosen with care. Even as we > bicker, a major automotive manufacturer is implementing an on-demand > customised workshop manual. > > The mechanic will simply enter the car's body number or VIN or > whatever, and

Third-party or out of the box plugins [was re: Frame's future]

2007-02-22 Thread Marcus Carr
Hedley Finger wrote: The original discussion was, generally, about what Adobe needed to do to find out what functionality their customers would need in the future. I attempted to make the point that a study of the third-party plugins would indicate to Adobe the gaps in FrameMaker's

Re: Third-party or out of the box plugins [was re: Frame's future]

2007-02-22 Thread hedley . finger
Marcus, Marcus, Marcus: I attempted to make the point that a study of the third-party plugins would indicate to Adobe the gaps in FrameMaker's functionality that they need to address, and chose indexing plugins as an example where there are many independent plugins to improve this

Re: Third-party or out of the box plugins [was re: Frame's future]

2007-02-22 Thread Marcus Carr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Marcus, Marcus, Marcus: Hedley, Hedley, Hedley... :-) I'm surprised that you of all people should associate functionality with presentation. It's a bit similar to separating format from content. 8^) And I'm surprised that you equate indexes only with hardcopy.

Re: Third-party or out of the box plugins [was re: Frame's future]

2007-02-22 Thread hedley . finger
Marcus^3: The example of the Turbo Tarburner was chosen with care. Even as we bicker, a major automotive manufacturer is implementing an on-demand customised workshop manual. The mechanic will simply enter the car's body number or VIN or whatever, and a custom manual for just the equipment

Re: Third-party or out of the box plugins [was re: Frame's future]

2007-02-22 Thread Marcus Carr
H4y^3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The example of the Turbo Tarburner was chosen with care. Even as we bicker, a major automotive manufacturer is implementing an on-demand customised workshop manual. The mechanic will simply enter the car's body number or VIN or whatever, and a custom manual

Third-party or "out of the box" plugins [was "re: Frame's future"]

2007-02-22 Thread hedley.fin...@myob.com
Since my post about plugins diverted this thread from its original topic onto a discussion of the merits of plugins, may I amplify my remarks? The original discussion was, generally, about what Adobe needed to do to find out what functionality their customers would need in the future. I

Third-party or out of the box plugins [was re: Frame's future]

2007-02-21 Thread hedley . finger
Since my post about plugins diverted this thread from its original topic onto a discussion of the merits of plugins, may I amplify my remarks? The original discussion was, generally, about what Adobe needed to do to find out what functionality their customers would need in the future. I