You also need to know the X-Resolution and the Y-Resolution of the image as 
well as the Resolution Unit. For example if you have an image that is 1500x900 
pixels and the Resolution is 300x300 and the Unit is Inch then:

1500/300 = 5 inches
900/300 = 3 inches

If the XML does not contain the resolution information then check to see if all 
of your image files are saved at one standard resolution. If so, then you can 
do the calculations using static numbers as above.

Steve Pawlowskis
Technology Coordinator

Kaufman Company, Inc.
19 Walkhill Road
Norwood MA   02062

Phone:        617.218.1765
Mobile:       774.437.1409
Toll Free:    800.338.8023  ext. 165
Fax:           617.218.1746





E-mail: stevep at kaufmanco.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com [mailto:framers-
> bounces at lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of
> Salvador.SorianoJr at wartsila.com
> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 12:03 AM
> To: framers at lists.frameusers.com
> Subject: RE: Framers Digest, Vol 45, Issue 16
>
> Hello Everyone,
>
> Just wanted to know the unit value closest to pixel in framemaker, or
> any idea on how could I probably convert this pixel unit into unit of
> measure which my framemaker file(dtd) could read. I have xml file, with
> images and the unit value of its attributes (specifically its width and
> height) are in pixel. Hence, I can't seem to find the unit pixel in
> framemaker.
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Best Regards,
> Alvin
>
> ? Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com [mailto:framers-
> bounces at lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of framers-
> request at lists.frameusers.com
> Sent: 20 July 2009 15:00
> To: framers at lists.frameusers.com
> Subject: Framers Digest, Vol 45, Issue 16
>
> Send Framers mailing list submissions to
>         framers at lists.frameusers.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/listinfo/framers
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         framers-request at lists.frameusers.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         framers-owner at lists.frameusers.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Framers digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Version 9 - XML support (Alison Peck)
>    2. FM 8/9 doesn't show joboptions [solved] (Stephan Will)
>    3. Re: AcroPro 9.0 & FM 7.2 - Do they behave well ? (Surbhi Singhal)
>    4. Standard font for technical documentation (mathieu jacquet)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 12:33:24 +0100
> From: "Alison Peck" <alison at clearly-stated.co.uk>
> Subject: Version 9 - XML support
> To: <framers at lists.frameusers.com>
> Message-ID: <000501ca0864$bd695870$383c0950$@co.uk>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="us-ascii"
>
> I'm currently using FM 7.2 and WebWorks standard to typeset a magazine
> and
> export the contents both as PDF (for print) and XML (which is sent off
> to
> someone else who prepares it for a variety of other formats). I'm using
> FM
> as opposed to any other tool primarily because:
>
> 1)      I had a copy before taking on this job, and know how to use it
>
> 2)      The XML produced via WebWorks was suitable for whatever (I
> don't
> have details) was being done with it, for minimal extra effort on my
> part.
>
>
>
> I'm reaching the stage where lack of Unicode support is starting to
> become a
> bit of a problem. I've got the odd Hebrew character in equations this
> time
> around, and can't get these into the document. New versions of FM don't
> come
> with WebWorks as a bundle (I believe?), so my questions are:
>
>
>
> 1)      If I upgrade, will my existing version of WebWorks (version
> 8.0)
> work with the new FM - has anyone tried?
>
> 2)      Is the XML output from version 9 of FM good? (Basically, I have
> FM
> paragraph and character formats mapped to tags - primary purpose of my
> work
> is for print, so there is always a bit of a compromise)
>
> 3)      Can anyone recommend a better package, if I'm going to have to
> spend
> the money anyway? (I was wondering what InDesign's XML export is like.)
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
>
>
> Alison
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 19:04:07 +0200
> From: Stephan Will <st.will at mk-will.de>
> Subject: FM 8/9 doesn't show joboptions [solved]
> To: framers at lists.frameusers.com
> Message-ID: <4A635207.80409 at mk-will.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
>
> Hello Framers,
>
> maybe it is of interest for someone, so here is the solution.
>
> With the help of the sysinternals tools I was able to find out, why
> FrameMaker didn't showed my joboptions.
>
> With the uninstall of Acrobat 8 a registry entry was deleted.
> It was the path information of "AcroDist.exe".
>
> FrameMaker first tries to find this registry information (the path to
> acrodist.exe) and when it is not found, FM states "No Distiller
> installed" and stops to find the needed information about the
> joboptions.
>
> Unfortunately, the repair function of Acrobat wasn't able to solve this
> problem.
>
> After inserting that registry entry, FrameMaker is showing my
> joboptions
> again.
>
> Best regards
> Stephan
>
>
> Am Wed Jul 08 2009 18:29:08 GMT+0200  schrieb Stephan Will
> <st.will at mk-will.de>:
> > Hello Framers,
> >
> > for two days now FrameMaker 8.0.4 and 9.0.2 doesn't show my distiller
> > joboptions (Acrobat 9.1.2 / Vista 64 sp1) when I open the PDF
> settings
> > dialog (either from the menu or the print dialog).
> > Error message (german) "Keine PDF-Auftragsoptionen verf?gbar" (No
> > PDF-joboptions available).
> >
> > I have done repair installations of Acrobat 9 (two times) and
> FrameMaker
> > 8 (once), no changing of behaviour.
> >
> > The problem occured after my uninstall of Acrobat 8 (yes I know, that
> I
> > should not have installed different versions of Acrobat at the same
> time).
> > But I hadn't any problems as long as Acrobat 8 and 9 were installed,
> BUT
> > as I uninstalled Acrobat 8 the problem started.
> >
> > So maybe someone can help me with a hint what the problem is.
> >
> > I have no idea, because the distiller works perfect with its
> joboptions
> > and all other software does as well.
> > The joboption-files are placed in the correct folder.
> >
> > As I am on the digest-mode, please put my email in the cc-field of
> your
> > answer. Thank you.
> >
> > Best regards
> > Stephan
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:07:43 +0530
> From: Surbhi Singhal <surbhee at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: AcroPro 9.0 & FM 7.2 - Do they behave well ?
> To: Joel <eleysium at gmail.com>
> Cc: framers at lists.frameusers.com
> Message-ID:
>         <3457b8270907192337w618b245ega68d43095a23f2bd at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Hello Joel
> I did try re-installing Acrobat 7 , but that does not help :(
>
> Regards
> Surbhi
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Joel <eleysium at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > You may just be able to uninstall/reinstall Acrobat 7 and get the
> menu
> > back. It's a chronological time of install thing.
> >
> > Joel
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 1:39 AM, Surbhi Singhal <surbhee at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello Fred
> >> One thing, which i encountered was that with Adobe Pro 7.0 and
> Office
> >> 2007,
> >> the "Adobe PDF" menu that was appearing in office applications,
> ceased to
> >> exist.
> >> The menu was available with Adobe Pro 7.0 and Office 2003.
> >>
> >> Could you please comment on the same.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Surbhi
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Fred Ridder <docudoc at hotmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Our corporate IT people circulated the same rumor about some
> >> > incompatibility between Acrobat 7.0 and Office 2007 when they were
> >> preparing
> >> > to roll out the MS suite to the whole corporation (>10K users). I
> was
> >> using
> >> > Acrobat 7.0 at the time and I saw no incompatibility or other
> issues on
> >> my
> >> > system after upgrading to Office 2007. But the following week I
> did
> >> upgrade
> >> > to Acrobat 9.0 Pro anyway to maintain parity with my peers and
> because
> >> the
> >> > cost of the upgrade was automatically pre-approved due to the
> alleged
> >> > incompatibility.
> >> >
> >> > At that same time, I was still using FrameMaker 7.0, and I saw no
> >> > compatibility issues of any kind using that Acrobat version with
> Acrobat
> >> > 9.0. But I should also point out that I *never* use the Save As
> PDF
> >> command,
> >> > which requires the highest level of compatibility between FM and
> >> Acrobat.
> >> >
> >> > According to my personal experience (admittedly a single data
> point),
> >> you
> >> > may not need to upgrade to Acrobat 9.0, but if you do you should
> not
> >> have
> >> > any serious issues using it with FrameMaker, with the possible
> exception
> >> fo
> >> > Save As PDF, which is not the optimum way to generate PDF in any
> case.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > -Fred Ridder
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > > Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 09:43:24 +0530
> >> > > Subject: AcroPro 9.0 & FM 7.2 - Do they behave well ?
> >> > > From: ankur.1978 at gmail.com
> >> > > To: framers at lists.frameusers.com
> >> > >
> >> > > Hello Framers
> >> > >
> >> > > I have recently switched to Office 2007, which i believe, does
> not
> >> > support
> >> > > Acrobat Professional 7.0. I downloaded an AcroPro v 9.0 trial
> version,
> >> > which
> >> > > seems to mingle well with Office 2007.
> >> > >
> >> > > Apart from Office 2007, I am an exhaustive user of FM 7.2 also.
> Now, i
> >> > have
> >> > > two queries:
> >> > >
> >> > > 1) Does AcroPro 9.0 behave well with FM 7.2 (i have not tested
> yet) ?
> >> > > 2) What is the approximate cost of upgarding five AcroPro 7.0
> licenses
> >> to
> >> > > AcroPro 9.0 (Adobe support, can you help) ?
> >> > >
> >> > > regards
> >> > > Ankur
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Send list messages to framers at lists.frameusers.com.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> >> > > > framers-unsubscribe at lists.frameusers.com
> >> > > > or visit
> >> > > >
> >> >
> >>
> http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/ankur.1978%40gmail.
> com
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Send administrative questions to listadmin at frameusers.com.
> Visit
> >> > > > http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
> >> > > >
> >> > > _______________________________________________
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > You are currently subscribed to Framers as DocuDoc at hotmail.com.
> >> > >
> >> > > Send list messages to framers at lists.frameusers.com.
> >> > >
> >> > > To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> >> > > framers-unsubscribe at lists.frameusers.com
> >> > > or visit
> >> >
> >>
> http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/docudoc%40hotmail.c
> om
> >> > >
> >> > > Send administrative questions to listadmin at frameusers.com. Visit
> >> > > http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > You are currently subscribed to Framers as surbhee at gmail.com.
> >> >
> >> > Send list messages to framers at lists.frameusers.com.
> >> >
> >> > To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> >> > framers-unsubscribe at lists.frameusers.com
> >> > or visit
> >> >
> http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/surbhee%40gmail.com
> >> >
> >> > Send administrative questions to listadmin at frameusers.com. Visit
> >> > http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >>
> >>
> >>  You are currently subscribed to Framers as eleysium at gmail.com.
> >>
> >> Send list messages to framers at lists.frameusers.com.
> >>
> >> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> >> framers-unsubscribe at lists.frameusers.com
> >> or visit
> >>
> http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/eleysium%40gmail.co
> m
> >>
> >> Send administrative questions to listadmin at frameusers.com. Visit
> >> http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 06:57:19 +0000
> From: mathieu jacquet <bobitch at hotmail.com>
> Subject: Standard font for technical documentation
> To: <framers at lists.frameusers.com>
> Message-ID: <SNT102-W56DA37DE59D3CA86921B92B61D0 at phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
> Dear all,
> is there any "standard font" for writing Getting Started guides, User
> Manuals and other technical documents? Which one do you personnally
> use? Do you find that some fonts offer a better "reading quality" than
> others?
> Thank you very much in anticipation.
> Yours sincerely,
> Mathieu.
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> T?l?phonez gratuitement ? tous vos proches avec Windows Live Messenger?
> !? T?l?chargez-le maintenant !
> http://www.windowslive.fr/messenger/1.asp
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to
> Framers.
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/listinfo/framers
> Send administrative questions to listadmin at frameusers.com. Visit
> http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
>
> End of Framers Digest, Vol 45, Issue 16
> ***************************************
> _______________________________________________
>
>
> You are currently subscribed to Framers as stevep at kaufmanco.com.
>
> Send list messages to framers at lists.frameusers.com.
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> framers-unsubscribe at lists.frameusers.com
> or visit
> http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/stevep%40kaufmanco.
> com
>
> Send administrative questions to listadmin at frameusers.com. Visit
> http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> _
> Kaufman Company scans and filters all incoming e-mail for viruses, SPAM
> and questionable material.
> _______________________________________________________________________
> _

________________________________________________________________________
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.

If you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the 
message.

Kaufman Company scans all outgoing e-mail for viruses, SPAM and questionable 
material.
________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to