On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 23:23 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > How does that sound? I'll give you all the help you need to implement
> > this.
> Thanks, I will probably need some help with making button events.
My resident X hacker (& boss) has told me that faking these kind of
mouse even
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 23:23 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 09:27:22PM +0100, Rob Bradford wrote:
> > Martin, Mickey,
> >
> > You are indeed right in spotting that X properties is probably the wrong
> > thing here. I think the nicest solution is to synthesise the appropri
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 20:54 +0200, Dr. Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> >> sounds pretty cool -- there's just one question I'm asking myself...
> >> do we really need dbus for that or would X-Properties be sufficient
> >> (and more efficient) here?
> >>
> > I will take that
Hi Martin,
>> sounds pretty cool -- there's just one question I'm asking myself...
>> do we really need dbus for that or would X-Properties be sufficient
>> (and more efficient) here?
>>
> I will take that in mind.
> My problem is that D-Bus is made for IPC while X-Properties don'
Hi,
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:41:14 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> According to bug #449, I was asked to reimplement fingerwheel
> and toolbar to have just one instance in memory and communicate over
> D-Bus.
thanks for helping out. :-)
> My idea is:
>
Hi Martin,
sounds pretty cool -- there's just one question I'm asking myself...
do we really need dbus for that or would X-Properties be sufficient
(and more efficient) here?
Best regards,
- Michael Lauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://openmoko.org/
Hi,
According to bug #449, I was asked to reimplement fingerwheel and
toolbar to have just one instance in memory and communicate over
D-Bus.
My idea is:
Daemon invoked by D-Bus if needed.
Daemon keeps only one instance of finger
