Re: [Framework-Team] Re: Now what do we do?

2006-09-04 Thread Raphael Ritz
Alec Mitchell schrieb: On 9/1/06, Alexander Limi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [..] While I think what you are doing is great, it feels like the wrong layer to solve it at when it comes to embedding something in the core. +1 to holding off on this (though like limi's, my vote doesn't count for

[Framework-Team] Re: Now what do we do?

2006-09-04 Thread Martin Aspeli
Raphael Ritz wrote: Alec Mitchell schrieb: On 9/1/06, Alexander Limi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [..] While I think what you are doing is great, it feels like the wrong layer to solve it at when it comes to embedding something in the core. +1 to holding off on this (though like limi's, my vote

Re: [Framework-Team] [Fwd: Re: Zope 3 as a reliable platform?!?]

2006-09-04 Thread Raphael Ritz
Martin Aspeli schrieb: [..] I've said it before, I think we're causing ourselves unnecessary pain by supporting two versions. There was an argument about installers not being ready for 2.9, which no longer applies for 3.0 I don't think. There is an argument about not going with the .0 releases

[Framework-Team] PLIP48 bundle ready

2006-09-04 Thread Simon Eisenmann
Hi guys, i just made a review bundle for PLIP 48. http://dev.plone.org/plone/browser/review/plip48-bundle, Please let me know if there needs to be changed something. Best regards, Simon ps: i know that the unittests are not uptodate.. I did not have the time to fix them yet .. -- Simon

Re: [Framework-Team] PLIP48 bundle ready

2006-09-04 Thread Wichert Akkerman
This one got stuck in the moderation queue.. Previously Simon Eisenmann wrote: Hi guys, i just made a review bundle for PLIP 48. http://dev.plone.org/plone/browser/review/plip48-bundle, Please let me know if there needs to be changed something. Best regards, Simon ps: i know