Wichert Akkerman wrote:
As you're all probably aware there has been some discussion recently
about the kss based content tab switching feature in Plone 3. I have
tried to get a good grasp on the situations and this is what I came
up with.
This discussions revolves around the implementation of
Hanno Schlichting schrieb:
[..]
Do we really want to update existing sites? They already have their
customized workflows and I don't quite see why we should pollute their
workflow tools with any new ones.
IIRC we discussed this at the Archipelago sprint and at least
at that time there was
Previously Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Hi,
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Alex Clark wrote:
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 12:27:18AM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I have been looking at the new workflows in the CMFPlone
aclrak-ui-sprint-workflow-integration branch and I'm afraid they
Hi Godefroid,
- the in-place loading behaviour breaks the back button. This breaks
user expectations and leads to frustration.
- one of the risks mentioned in the PLIP mentions is that the tabs are
no longer bookmarkable but says that we are willing to sacrifice this
for the speed
I general I agree; it's mostly a practical issue here because
the old API for adding workflows to the tool is gone and
I simply don't know whether/how GS supports doing only
parts of an import step (import wf x and y but leave z alone;
don't touch the chains ...) but maybe it's just me and all
Martin Aspeli schrieb:
I general I agree; it's mostly a practical issue here because
the old API for adding workflows to the tool is gone and
I simply don't know whether/how GS supports doing only
parts of an import step (import wf x and y but leave z alone;
don't touch the chains ...) but maybe
Hi Raphael,
On 2/28/07, Raphael Ritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Aspeli schrieb:
I general I agree; it's mostly a practical issue here because
the old API for adding workflows to the tool is gone and
I simply don't know whether/how GS supports doing only
parts of an import step (import
Martin Aspeli schrieb:
[..]
I need to look at this in more detail, but we'd need to find a way of
doing it at a lower level. Hell, I'd copy the XML-parsing code and
make it more defensive if necessary. :)
My hope (without looking at the code in detail) was that the logic
that parses the
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 02:01:06 + Martin Aspeli wrote:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Opinions? Thoughts?
Secondly, I think the KSS team can possibly add more value fixing other
things (a few bugs, the inline editing UI, a few other places where a
sprinking of KSS goodness could help, e.g.
