We've got several tickets for installer improvements that I hope can be
included with 3.2. Joel, Limi, Sidnei and I came up with most of these at
the NOLA symposium. They're tagged with the "installerexperience" keyword,
and Limi has created a report to summarize them:
http://dev.plone.org/plone/r
Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > The packaging goal we want to achieve is to move to a fully eggified
> > release. I have done some experimentation with that and the result works
> > remarkably well: I have created a 3.2 branch of ploneout (at
> > https://svn.plone.o
I have done a bit of thinking and experimentation over the last two days
to see how we should approach Plone 3.2. As has been discussed here
before the goal for 3.2 is packaging and installation improvements. To
make 3.2 a succes I want is to focus on just those two aspects. For all
other purpo
