Re: [Framework-Team] Re: NuPlone and Plone 3.2

2009-01-13 Thread Raphael Ritz
Martin Aspeli wrote: [..] - Add Products.NuPlone as a dependency of the Plone egg. This would mean 'Plone' always comes with NuPlone, but there's no reason overt for the dependency. +1 as I consider this the closed to what we used to do so far. Raphael - Add it to the [versions] block,

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: NuPlone and Plone 3.2

2009-01-13 Thread Tom Lazar
On 13.01.2009, at 00:14, Hanno Schlichting wrote: Martin Aspeli wrote: The question now is how we deal with the release. We could: - Add Products.NuPlone as a dependency of the Plone egg. This would mean 'Plone' always comes with NuPlone, but there's no reason overt for the dependency. +1