[Framework-Team] Re: [Plone 4] Working out a timeline

2009-06-22 Thread Martin Aspeli
Eric Steele wrote: Ok, so I promised a draft timeline before our meeting on Tuesday. Here's what I've got: - Aug 16 initial implementation Oh what? Each PLIP? - Aug 30 first review due - Sept 13 revisions due - Sept 27 review of revisions / vote - Oct 4 Alpha 1 release - Oct 25 Beta 1

Re: [Framework-Team] [Plone 4] Working out a timeline

2009-06-22 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Eric Steeleems...@psu.edu wrote: Ok, so I promised a draft timeline before our meeting on Tuesday. Here's what I've got: - Aug 16 initial implementation - Aug 30 first review due - Sept 13 revisions due - Sept 27 review of revisions / vote - Oct 4 Alpha 1

[Framework-Team] Meeting tomorrow

2009-06-22 Thread Matthew Wilkes
Hello all, To confirm, are we meeting at 1800 UTC on #plone-framework tomorrow? Matt ___ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team

Re: [Framework-Team] Meeting tomorrow

2009-06-22 Thread David Glick
On Jun 22, 2009, at 2:14 PM, Matthew Wilkes wrote: To confirm, are we meeting at 1800 UTC on #plone-framework tomorrow? I am planning on it. Do we have an agenda other than general discussion of the submitted PLIPs and scope of 4.0? David Glick Web Developer ONE/Northwest New tools and

Re: [Framework-Team] Meeting tomorrow

2009-06-22 Thread Eric Steele
On Jun 22, 2009, at 5:14 PM, Matthew Wilkes wrote: Hello all, To confirm, are we meeting at 1800 UTC on #plone-framework tomorrow? Matt Matt, We'll be attempting a phone conference in order to avoid the Skype mess we had the last time. See

[Framework-Team] Re: PLIP deadline overly aggressive?

2009-06-22 Thread Alexander Limi
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 21:32:19 -0700, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote: - We use this PLIP review cycle to start assigning PLIPs to 4.1. There's no reason we can't and shouldn't start planning for that now. So, if a PLIP looks like it'll take longer to do, we can still vote +1

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: PLIP deadline overly aggressive?

2009-06-22 Thread Alec Mitchell
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Alexander Limil...@plone.org wrote: On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 21:32:19 -0700, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:  - We use this PLIP review cycle to start assigning PLIPs to 4.1. There's no reason we can't and shouldn't start planning for that now. So, if

[Framework-Team] Re: update on supporting Python 2.6 / Zope 2.12 / CMF 2.2

2009-06-22 Thread Alexander Limi
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 21:38:28 -0700, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote: I think it's important that Plone has at least a welcome page when you install it. Staring at a blank folder_listing is going to put off new users. We can probably bet rid of the News and Events collections,

[Framework-Team] Re: PLIP deadline overly aggressive?

2009-06-22 Thread Martin Aspeli
Alec Mitchell wrote: On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Alexander Limil...@plone.org wrote: On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 21:32:19 -0700, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote: - We use this PLIP review cycle to start assigning PLIPs to 4.1. There's no reason we can't and shouldn't start planning

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: PLIP deadline overly aggressive?

2009-06-22 Thread Alec Mitchell
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Martin Aspelioptilude+li...@gmail.com wrote: Alec Mitchell wrote: On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Alexander Limil...@plone.org wrote: On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 21:32:19 -0700, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:  - We use this PLIP review cycle to