On 12 March 2010 01:24, Matthew Wilkes matt...@matthewwilkes.co.uk wrote:
On 2010-03-09, at 0250, Eric Steele wrote:
So... now that those bums are out the door, how do we go about appointing
a 4.x team for me to abuse?
Well, on a more general note, I think we need a bit better separation
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk wrote:
What happened in the 3.x series, I thought the 3.0 team stayed on.
No. One member of the team stayed on from the 3.0 team for the 3.1
team. The 3.1 team then stayed the same for the 3.2 and 3.3 releases.
The main idea here
Hi there,
with Plone 4 beta 1 out the door and the 4.0 framework team having
done its job, it's time to look ahead into the future a bit.
Eric has started the discussion around Plone 4.1 already, I'll let him
drive that process :)
But I had a look at the PLIP's we have seen and feature
On 12 March 2010 15:07, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
Currently listed for Plone 4.x are things like:
...
- Well formed, valid XHTML (as a foundation for easier theming via xdv)
Just to note that xdv uses the HTMLParser which is really very
tolerant of badly formed markup (an
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk wrote:
On 12 March 2010 15:07, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
Currently listed for Plone 4.x are things like:
...
- Well formed, valid XHTML (as a foundation for easier theming via xdv)
Just to note that xdv uses the
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010, Alexander Limi wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Eric Steele ems...@psu.edu wrote:
On Mar 11, 2010, at 8:00 PM, Eric Steele wrote:
Thanks, Jon! I'll take care of this tonight. :)
Eric
On second thought, I'll hold off on this until we have installers
available.
On 3/12/10 10:22 AM, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010, Alexander Limi wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Eric Steele ems...@psu.edu wrote:
On Mar 11, 2010, at 8:00 PM, Eric Steele wrote:
Thanks, Jon! I'll take care of this tonight. :)
Eric
On second thought, I'll
Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu
writes:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk wrote:
What happened in the 3.x series, I thought the 3.0 team stayed on.
No. One member of the team stayed on from the 3.0 team for the 3.1
team. The 3.1 team then stayed the same
On 2010-3-12 19:37, David Glick wrote:
On 3/12/10 10:22 AM, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010, Alexander Limi wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Eric Steeleems...@psu.edu wrote:
On Mar 11, 2010, at 8:00 PM, Eric Steele wrote:
Thanks, Jon! I'll take care of this tonight. :)
On Mar 12, 2010, at 10:55 AM, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net
wrote:
On 2010-3-12 19:37, David Glick wrote:
On 3/12/10 10:22 AM, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010, Alexander Limi wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Eric Steeleems...@psu.edu
wrote:
On Mar 11, 2010,
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Hi there,
with Plone 4 beta 1 out the door and the 4.0 framework team having
done its job, it's time to look ahead into the future a bit.
Eric has started the discussion around Plone 4.1 already, I'll let him
drive that process :)
But I had a look at the PLIP's we
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
On 2010-3-12 19:37, David Glick wrote:
On 3/12/10 10:22 AM, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010, Alexander Limi wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Eric Steeleems...@psu.edu wrote:
On Mar 11, 2010, at 8:00 PM, Eric Steele wrote:
12 matches
Mail list logo
