On Jan 20, 2009, at 6:03 PM, Florian Schulze wrote:
I just realized that my mails never made it to this list. I worked
on this PLIP last week and forgot about the review bundle. I did the
review bundle on the same day I was informed by Andi about this and
replied to Andis mail, but my mails
On 20 jan 2009, at 23:08, Martijn Pieters wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 21:43, Andreas Zeidler a...@zitc.de wrote:
Do whatever you feel is right considering that I missed the
deadline.
personally i think it'd be stupid to not consider changes that were
ready
for a while now. i mean,
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:43:47 +0100, Andreas Zeidler
a...@zitc.de wrote:
#232: Resource Registries Improvements —
i've included the authors of these PLIPs via cc: hoping they might be
able to clarify here. otherwise we'll have to skip reviewing them,
which means they can't be considered
On Jan 20, 2009, at 6:03 PM, Florian Schulze wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:43:47 +0100, Andreas Zeidler a...@zitc.de
wrote:
#232: Resource Registries Improvements —
i've included the authors of these PLIPs via cc: hoping they might be
able to clarify here. otherwise we'll have to skip
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 21:43, Andreas Zeidler a...@zitc.de wrote:
Do whatever you feel is right considering that I missed the deadline.
personally i think it'd be stupid to not consider changes that were ready
for a while now. i mean, yes technically you missed the deadline, but to me
i
Andreas Zeidler wrote:
[..]
personally i think it'd be stupid to not consider changes that were
ready for a while now. i mean, yes technically you missed the
deadline, but to me i makes a subtle difference if you the code isn't
quite ready yet or if only the notification mail went missing —
