[Framework-Team] Re: Review for PLIP 179 - commenting

2006-09-23 Thread Kai Diefenbach
Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kai Diefenbach wrote: Hi Martin, hi all Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes. nested comments are on the top of my todo list. You may be able to re-use the Ploneboard interfaces directly, or model something closely on them. A lot of

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: Review for PLIP 179 - commenting

2006-09-22 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Kai Diefenbach wrote: Or different asked: why aren't comments folderish types and stores replies inside itself. Wouldn't it makes it easier to delete and traverse comments of comments? Because we need to support a flat view of comments and having to iterate through a hierarchy is

[Framework-Team] Re: Review for PLIP 179 - commenting

2006-09-20 Thread Kai Diefenbach
Hi Martin, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [a lot of helpful and interesting comments] Thanks for your comments. I will go on with development of plone.commenting today and I will try to take they all to my heart :) Kai ___ Framework-Team

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: Review for PLIP 179 - commenting

2006-09-18 Thread Martin Aspeli
Hi Kai, - user informationis duplicated in all comments Yes, that's true. A possible solution could be just to save the member id for a authenticated member, but then we should think about the case a member will be deleted. This is true, but storing member id is probably sufficient. I'd

[Framework-Team] Re: Review for PLIP 179 - commenting

2006-09-17 Thread Kai Diefenbach
Hi Wichert, (should I have this sent to framework-team@lists.plone.org, also?) Am 13.09.2006 um 21:09 schrieb Wichert Akkerman: There are a few issues with the infrastructure: - since most of easycommenting is about putting a framework in place to support pluggable commenting this should