On Fri, 2006-01-12 at 14:23 -0200, Sidnei da Silva wrote: > On 12/1/06, Rocky Burt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > An awesome secondary goal would then be to create archetype-style > > wrapper widgets so that we could stop having to maintain two sets of > > widgets (one for achetypes, another for formlib). The archetype widget > > would simply be a wrapper for the formlib widget which would make BBB > > much easier. > > Well, I'm going the other way around. I've wrote an adapter for AT > Widgets so that they implement IWidget. A secondary goal of mine was > to write an adapter to AT Fields to implement IField. And then we > could use AT stuff unmodified with formlib. With not too much effort I > still believe that's doable.
I was avoiding that direction on purpose. Building widgets in a nice clean zope3 way and then writing an archetypes compatiblity layer would help BBB. Building widgets in AT style and providing a formlib compatiblity layer means people will continue writing archetypes widgets :( - Rocky -- Rocky Burt ServerZen Software -- http://www.serverzen.com News About The Server (blog) -- http://www.serverzen.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
