Re: [Framework-Team] Re: wicked integration w/ plone 3

2007-01-08 Thread Tom Lazar
On Jan 8, 2007, at 11:29 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote: On 1/8/07, whit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ ] enable wiki [ ] use media wiki syntax - enabled types - Event Page News Why do we need both an enable wiki option and a list of enabled types? If all the types are deselected, wiki

[Framework-Team] Re: wicked integration w/ plone 3

2007-01-07 Thread whit
I should ammend previous email to say... I see a couple broken tests in plone, but they don't appear to have anything to do with wicked on the surface. -w ___ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: wicked integration w/ plone 3

2007-01-07 Thread whit
the old stuff has been reviewed but the new stuff should be looked over too. banging on the controlpanel right now(wrote the code, still need to test).The rough and ready choices are the following:: [ ] enable wiki [ ] use media wiki syntax - enabled types - Event Page News -w

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: wicked integration w/ plone 3

2007-01-05 Thread Martin Aspeli
Hi Raphael, I don't think having TTW configuration for which *fields* should get the Wicked treatment makes much sense (too low level). Agreed. But in the long run it might very well make sense. I like for instance the 'textfilter' approach and I could imagine more functionality managed

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: wicked integration w/ plone 3

2007-01-05 Thread whit
Raphael Ritz wrote: Martin Aspeli schrieb: [..] I don't think having TTW configuration for which *fields* should get the Wicked treatment makes much sense (too low level). Agreed. But in the long run it might very well make sense. I like for instance the 'textfilter' approach and I could

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: wicked integration w/ plone 3

2007-01-05 Thread whit
snip Interesting idea. The problem is possibly that people may not know the full name of the content type (this is a vocabulary thing rather than a free text thing), but certainly supporting this optionally would be cool. I'd assume it wouldn't even be that hard to add (possibly at a later

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: wicked integration w/ plone 3

2007-01-05 Thread whit
Alexander Limi wrote: On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 02:33:54 -0800, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think having TTW configuration for which *fields* should get the Wicked treatment makes much sense (too low level). Having a way to turn the behaviour on/off and possibly change the syntax

[Framework-Team] Re: wicked integration w/ plone 3

2007-01-05 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Martin Aspeli wrote: whit wrote: does anyone have a good formlib example for a controlpanel that *doesn't* edit a cmf tool? plone.app.controlpanel has none? There are examples of formlib in plone.app.contentrules and plone.app.portlets.portlets, and Rocky has a formlib tutorial.

[Framework-Team] Re: wicked integration w/ plone 3

2007-01-05 Thread Alexander Limi
On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 17:54:36 -0800, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Emphasis on we ship. I would strongly -1 having this on for every RichField in every product (i.e. do it at the AT level), which is how I read it the first time. Doing it for Document, News Item and Event is probably