George Lee wrote:
I've made changes to
- ploneout 3.0 branch (switching to maintenance 1.0 branches for
plone.contentrules, plone.app.contentrules and plone.app.form)
- ploneout 3.1 branch (adding plone.portlet.static and
plone.portlet.collection to the buildout)
How about ploneout
I merged PLIPs 208 and 217 tonight. The following changes were made:
* The plip208 branch of borg.localrole was merged into trunk
* borg.localrole was added to the 3.1 branch of ploneout
* A migration and procedural GS import step were added to CMFPlone 3.1
branch, along with tests
* A minor fix
On Feb 24, 2008, at 9:51 PM, George Lee wrote:
P.S. I think that as a matter of process it make sense that a
release manager
can make / ask for a major revert for time's sake, but that the
framework team
should then speak up on that because ultimately it's supposed to be
their
decision and
On Feb 24, 2008, at 5:30 PM, George Lee wrote:
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've just reverted the WebDAV changes from Sidnei after playing a bit
with them. I did this for two reasons:
Hanno had some very good remarks that need to be addressed
I tested the 3.1 tree with just
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 9:13 PM, Andreas Zeidler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 24, 2008, at 5:30 PM, George Lee wrote:
imho, yes. the fact that two additional packages are introduced by
the PLIP should have been pointed out, along with additional review
notes about them, or at least a
