Re: [PLIP-Advisories] [Plone] #9302: Improving the event type with recurrence, etc.
#9302: Improving the event type with recurrence, etc. --+- Reporter: regebro |Owner: regebro Type: PLIP | Status: assigned Priority: minor |Milestone: 4.x Component: Infrastructure| Resolution: Keywords: calendar, recurrence | --+- Changes (by massimo): * cc: massimo (added) -- Ticket URL: http://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/9302#comment:30 Plone http://plone.org Plone Content Management System ___ PLIP-Advisories mailing list plip-advisor...@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plip-advisories
Re: [Framework-Team] [Plone-developers] Upcoming Plone 4.0 releases
Op 20-05-10 22:00, David Glick schreef:
On 5/20/10 12:58 PM, Eric Steele wrote:
The main issues I'd like to see fixed and released before we move to RC are:
#10124 - should remove Large Plone Folder type and expose the folder
ordering setting in the schema
I have started working on this one.
#10360 - Incomplete migration: site_properties and portal_controlpanel
#10363 - Can not edit personal information when one is loged in with email
address
I fixed this one. Feel free to assign any remaining emaillogin related
tickets to me.
#10365 / #10366 - @@blob-file-migration fails on migrated site
#10549 - Uncaught NotFound exception in plone.app.linkintegrity when page
contains some @@{view} links
--
Maurits van Rees
Programmer, Zest Software
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
[Framework-Team] Improving the process -- PLIP UI and Documentation
FWT! I want to introduce two additions to the PLIP process that I'd like us to add into the Plone 4.1 process. UI: I'm pleased to announce that Plone now (finally/once-again?) has a UI Team. Alex will be heading up the effort alongside Geir Baekholt, Denys Mishunov, Sisi Nutt, and Nathan Van Gheem. I've asked them to serve as a non-blocking vote on each PLIP, providing a group response to each submission. Their goal will be to judge the UI elements of submitted PLIPs for consistency, usability, accessibility, and general saneness. This should give FWT members more time to focus on the underlying codebase. My hope is that the UI team will also be able to serve as a resource for PLIP implementers before and during the implementation phase, providing input on UI matters as needed. Documentation: In an effort to reduce the amount of time the Documentation Team needs to spend chasing down implementers for documentation, Israel is asking that we try to get as much of that taken care of during the PLIP process as we can. Essentially, we'd require that implementers submit full docs (not necessarily required to be well-written, but concept-complete) with their final code implementation. Assistance from the doc team will be available. I think we can get the majority of this content up front if we enforce proper proposal structure (something we were lax on in 4.0). I'd also like to recommend that structure be expanded to include: What existing documentation will need to be updated? What new documentation will need to be created? Will this require migration documentation? Ideally, the implementers would create the documentation directly in PHC, in the correct place, in 'private' workflow state. If updating documentation, implementers would duplicate the current document and edit the copy. The Docs Team will weigh in with their opinion of its status, to apprise the Framework Team of the implementers' compliance with this requirement. I believe Steve will be revving up the process for selecting the 4.x team in the near future. It's my hope that with these two new additions, we can continue to improve our process and reduce the strain on our new team. Eric ___ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
Re: [Framework-Team] Improving the process -- PLIP UI and Documentation
2010/5/22 Eric Steele ems...@psu.edu: FWT! I want to introduce two additions to the PLIP process that I'd like us to add into the Plone 4.1 process. +1 to both Martin ___ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
Re: [Framework-Team] [Plone-developers] Upcoming Plone 4.0 releases
On 5/20/10 12:58 PM, Eric Steele wrote:
The main issues I'd like to see fixed and released before we move to RC are:
#10549 - Uncaught NotFound exception in plone.app.linkintegrity when page
contains some @@{view} links
Fixed.
--
David Glick
Web Developer
Groundwire
206.286.1235x32
davidgl...@groundwire.org
http://groundwire.org
Sign up for Groundwire News!
Tips, tools and news delivered directly to your inbox.
http://groundwire.org/news-signup
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
