Hi Gil and all!
thanks Gil for your great work here!
I welcome our new members Rodrigo and Maik!
Since I am now a Board member - and as you may know from my board
nomination - I will also quit the framework team.
It would be just to many tasks for me. My opinion is, more than two
community
+1
On 26.03.19 23:12, Eric Bréhault wrote:
> Hello!
>
> We are running a sprint about Guillotina (see details below) in Toulouse
> from the 13th to the 16th of June 2019.
>
> Does the Framework Team agree to declare it as strategic?
>
> Eric
>
> Description:
>
> Guillotina is a great
Btw., I am +1 as well.
On 18.03.19 23:53, Jens W. Klein wrote:
> Johannes Raggam asked me to post this to the list:
>
>
> Dear friends from the framework team,
>
> I would like to propose the Buschenschanksprint as a Plone Strategic
> Sprint.
[..]
--
Klein
Johannes Raggam asked me to post this to the list:
Dear friends from the framework team,
I would like to propose the Buschenschanksprint as a Plone Strategic
Sprint.
The Buschenschanksprint is a happening where we can code and sleep on
site for five days, covering strategic topics for Plone
On 01.03.19 16:28, Gil Forcada Codinachs wrote:
> Why can not it be public already?
Well, I accidentally opened it anonymously and was able to read and
comment...
[...]
Jens
___
Framework-Team mailing list
framework-t...@lists.plone.org
On 2018-07-03 12:10, Philip Bauer wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> On October 1.-5. there will a sprint in Halle (hosted by Gocept) dedicated to
> finishing porting Plone and Zope to Python 3.
>
> I'd like to ask the framework team to declare this sprint a strategic sprint.
>
> The goals of the sprint
I.Need.Names!
Please send me names, contact info (if available) and a shortly why do
you think the person must be there!
Best send them directly to me, email see https://alpinecity.tirol/2018
Jens
--
Klein & Partner KG, member of BlueDynamics Alliance
Dear FWT,
I can not participate at todays meeting. See you next time!
Jens
(I still can't post anything to the Google event/G+, so back to the good
old and always working ML)
--
Klein & Partner KG, member of BlueDynamics Alliance
___
Framework-Team
Framework-Team mailing list
> framework-t...@lists.plone.org
> https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plone-framework-team
>
--
Beste Grüße
Jens W. Klein
Geschäftsführer
Partner der Klein & Partner KG
k l e i n & p a r t n e r
agentur für webtechnologien
Grabenweg 68
SOH
FYI:
I am in for this evening.
For some reason I still can not interact with the Google+/Hangouts
invitation. I can open it, but all interaction are a 404s by Google.
This is very strange.
However, joining the Hangouts call itself works.
Jens
--
Klein & Partner KG, member of BlueDynamics
fill out the event sponsorship request form...
>
> Cheers,
> Timo
> ___
> Framework-Team mailing list
> framework-t...@lists.plone.org
> https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plone-framework-team
>
--
Beste Grüße
Jens W. Klein
Ge
Hi,
instead of posting this to community.plone.org I would like to have
opinions on this from the FWT.
I had a quick look on our javascript dep defined here:
https://github.com/plone/Products.CMFPlone/blob/master/Products/CMFPlone/static/bower.json
besides its bower and should turned into a
Hi,
I propose, the framework team declares the Alpine City Sprint a
strategic sprint.
http://www.coactivate.org/projects/alpinecitysprint2017/project-home
It is planned to work on
- Zope 4,
- Plone on Zope 4,
- other Plone core development and
- Plone core cleanup.
This would allow us to try
On 2016-04-06 15:00, Eric Bréhault wrote:
> Sometimes jenkins is slow and the test fails just because we haven't
> waited long enough.
> Try to add a Sleep before your failing line.
Thanks, I tried it, but does not help. Finally I got it failing local
and I can go on with it.
Jens
--
Klein &
On 2016-04-06 14:31, Jens W. Klein wrote:
> On 2016-04-06 10:43, Jens W. Klein wrote:
>> Looks like I broke jenkins last night, will fix now, stay tuned. Jens
Everytime the same test.
-- Jens
___
Framework-Team mailing list
fr
On 2016-04-06 10:43, Jens W. Klein wrote:
> Looks like I broke jenkins last night, will fix now, stay tuned. Jens
So I fixed the problem with a test in plone.app.z3cform and it behaves
now as expected.
But one (seems unrelated) problem is left in p.a.multilingual robot
test. I tried to
should this be pliped?
https://github.com/plone/plone.app.contenttypes/pull/339
Jens
--
Klein & Partner KG, member of BlueDynamics Alliance
___
Framework-Team mailing list
framework-t...@lists.plone.org
On 2016-03-31 09:35, Eric Bréhault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> During last meeting we mention that GitHub templates cannot be used for
> comments, but Jean Jordaan just showed me Save Replies, a new Github
> feature: https://github.com/settings/replies
>
> It allows to store a predefined comment.
>
Did I miss the reason why we use an outdated pytz, older than in
underlying Zope 2.13.23?
pytz
2013b... http://dist.plone.org/release/5.0-latest/versions.cfg
2015.4.. http://dist.plone.org/versions/zope-2-13-23-versions.cfg
2013b...http://dist.plone.org/versions/zopetoolkit-1-0-8-ztk-versions.cfg
On 2016-01-12 16:58, Maurits van Rees wrote:
> Unfortunately we can't. Well, not without fixing tests in various packages,
> and possibly code outside the tests as well. IIRC there is an abandoned pull
> request or branch on coredev for this.
Huh, I think this is something we need to address.
Happy new year,
first things first: we will have enough coffee at Alpine City Sprint!
Johannes and I already collected a list of topics, this includes a bunch
of topic Eric Steele et al already collected.
It depends a lot on how many we are an who participates. Today we sent
out a bunch of
After some discussion I introduced the label "03 type: feature" exactly
for plips.
After some discussion the more general word "feature" was preferred and
I renamed it (I first named it "03 type: plip", but after discussions
first at at community.plone.org and then at 2015 conference we renamed
Since nobody has an opinion here I'll just go on with these use-cases.
Jens
On 2015-02-19 10:43, Jens W. Klein wrote:
I committed myself to dive a bit into the deprecation-topic. This is a
small update of work in progress.
Earlier in Plone we had ugly-nice deprecation-warnings on zope startup
On 2015-02-17 18:17, Johannes Raggam wrote:
Hi FWT,
I'm not going to make it today - I'm lying in the bed, being sick :/
However, I have two topics to contribute:
- PEP 440 compliant versioning scheme.
Timo, Gil and I were today briefly discussing a version-raise mistake I
made and our
On 2015-02-16 19:02, Timo Stollenwerk wrote:
[...]
We were working hard (especially Gil!) in the last month to get the new
Jenkins server ready for production:
http://78.47.49.108/
I think we could be ready within the next weeks. That would be a good
opportunity to switch the 5.0 branch to
Hi,
there is the folder Plone FWT at Google Drive. May we add the plip
spreadsheet to this folder as well?
I always find it difficult to hold all the loose ends of drive docs in
my hand. Folders are great to organize here. Afaik the owner of the
document can move it (move is more like a
:
I'm in ! +1
El Thu Jan 29 2015 at 11:34:54, Roel Bruggink (r...@fourdigits.nl
mailto:r...@fourdigits.nl) va escriure:
+1 I'm in.
On 29 January 2015 at 10:31, Jens W. Klein j...@bluedynamics.com
mailto:j...@bluedynamics.com wrote:
+1 I'am in, one hour before FWT hangout
+1 I'am in, one hour before FWT hangout sounds good.
Jens
On 2015-01-29 08:23, Timo Stollenwerk wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if we could discuss the CI rules and our development
process face to face during a hangout. I would like to get a better
understanding of what Nathan, Johannes, Jens and
Hi,
+1 for inviting Philip to the FWT meeting to discuss this topic.
I agree we have lots of advantages.
What I kept in mind from our discussion is one major risk: Third party
code depending on IFolderish queries will break, because theres no
difference any more.
We need to have a clear
Hi,
Johannes asked (and again poked) me if I would join the framework team.
After I'am now back deep into Plone and a conference later I think my
work could be of value - if theres space left on the framework team device.
kind regards
--
Klein Partner KG, member of BlueDynamics Alliance
. Now with 3.x only change minor and upgrades are
simple statement all are very happy!
The current plan to name it 4.0 is in my opinion very good, even if the
changes are not that major than first planned.
just my 0,02 Euro
--
Jens W. Klein - Klein Partner KEG - BlueDynamics Alliance
Am Tue, 05 May 2009 22:08:14 +0800 schrieb Martin Aspeli:
Jens W. Klein wrote:
I just can say here: I agree to delay features and make the next major
4.0 and not 3.5. Dont make the same mistakes again (looking at 2.5).
Who said anything about delaying features?
sorry - my bad english
this forward!
Jens
--
Jens W. Klein - Klein Partner KEG - BlueDynamics Alliance
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
In your PLIPs you wrote i.e. here https://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/8593
to remove parts out of Plone the Product. I fully agree to remove
features from the core!
But I think if we do so, there should be a set of Managed Plone
Products. Important add-ons like LinguaPlone or the removed parts
I'd like to nominate myself for the 4x framework team. I think I know
plones code in-depth. Also I know the community well (since 2004) and
also know how community works. I've been release-manager of Archetypes,
contributed a bunch of code to the whole stack.
I'am a pragmatic person: I would
35 matches
Mail list logo
