Re: [Framework-Team] Plone 2009: Going from here

2009-05-07 Thread Andreas Zeidler
On May 6, 2009, at 5:15 PM, Steve McMahon wrote: We need to move the Plone 2009 proposal forward (whether it's 3.5 or 4.0). first of all, thanks for following up on this, steve! I'd like to suggest that the combined Plone 3 and 4 framework teams make the decisions on this. i'm not

Re: [Framework-Team] Plone 2009: Going from here

2009-05-07 Thread Andreas Zeidler
On May 6, 2009, at 5:15 PM, Steve McMahon wrote: I suggest that the Framework Teams try to make the basic decisions and suggest a release manager by May 13th. That will allow the board to take it up at our May14th meeting. oh, and +1 on that. andi -- zeidler it consulting - http://zitc.de/

Re: [Framework-Team] Plone 2009: Going from here

2009-05-07 Thread Martijn Pieters
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 18:16, Martijn Pieters m...@zopatista.com wrote: 1) Should there be a significant new feature release of Plone this year? What are its most basic goals? Which framework team is in charge? [..] I'd nominate the incumbent 3.x team for this; this team already has the

Re: [Framework-Team] Plone 2009: Going from here

2009-05-06 Thread Martijn Pieters
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 17:15, Steve McMahon st...@dcn.org wrote: 1) Should there be a significant new feature release of Plone this year? What are its most basic goals? Which framework team is in charge? Hanno already outlined the goals, I'd say go with those. I'd nominate the incumbent 3.x