Re: [Framework-Team] Re: Now what do we do?

2006-09-04 Thread Raphael Ritz
Alec Mitchell schrieb: On 9/1/06, Alexander Limi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [..] While I think what you are doing is great, it feels like the wrong layer to solve it at when it comes to embedding something in the core. +1 to holding off on this (though like limi's, my vote doesn't count for

[Framework-Team] Re: Now what do we do?

2006-09-04 Thread Martin Aspeli
Raphael Ritz wrote: Alec Mitchell schrieb: On 9/1/06, Alexander Limi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [..] While I think what you are doing is great, it feels like the wrong layer to solve it at when it comes to embedding something in the core. +1 to holding off on this (though like limi's, my vote

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: Now what do we do?

2006-09-01 Thread Alec Mitchell
On 9/1/06, Alexander Limi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 10:52:21 -0700, Encolpe Degoute [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Our team wishes to highlight PLIP 154 as we think it is nearly implemented by FileSystemStorage + AttachmentField (still SVN). By the time Plone 3.5 ships, it's

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: Now what do we do?

2006-08-30 Thread Helge Tesdal
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:31:19 +0200, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Glad you feel that way, I don't want to be seen to tell people what to do! Personally, though, I prefer to get a bit of a nudge rather than have to do all the leg work myself (and I was in need of a distraction).

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: Now what do we do?

2006-08-30 Thread Martin Aspeli
Helge Tesdal wrote: On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:31:19 +0200, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Glad you feel that way, I don't want to be seen to tell people what to do! Personally, though, I prefer to get a bit of a nudge rather than have to do all the leg work myself (and I was in need of a

[Framework-Team] Re: Now what do we do?

2006-08-30 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi all. Martin Aspeli wrote: Hi guys, I took a look at the PLIPs still remaining. I put some preliminary names to some of PLIPs, purely along the lines that I thought people may be interested in. All the ones with ? in front of them are just suggestions - the other ones are the ones Wiggy,

[Framework-Team] Re: Now what do we do?

2006-08-29 Thread Martin Aspeli
Wichert Akkerman wrote: Previously Martin Aspeli wrote: PLIP 173 - OpenID support This one is mine. The current status shows the design nicely but there are a couple of essential bits (like session authentication) still missing (they are listed in the docs in the bundle). I expect it to be