On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 14:01:50 +0100, Martin Aspeli
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi guys,
Following discussions with Whit, Alec and Rocky on the channel last
night, and from the lists before, I've created and checked in two
packages:
- plone.memoize: contains Whit's memojito memoization d
Florian Schulze wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I did no benchmarks yet, but it feels quite a bit faster now. Did anyone
> do some before after comparisons?
Yep, I did some very basic benchmarks (ab, ZopeProfiler, PTProfiler).
For the front-page for an anonymous user the rough numbers were:
Plone 2.5 trunk ->
Hi.
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>
> Plone 2.5 branch -> 5 requests/sec
> Plone 3.0 some days ago -> 3.5 requests/sec
> Plone 3.0 right now -> 4.0 requests/sec
>
> Plone 3.0 without old-style portlets -> 6.0 requests/sec
And as another reference:
Plone 2.1 branch -> 5.7 requests/sec
Hanno
P.S. I
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Florian Schulze wrote:
Hi!
I did no benchmarks yet, but it feels quite a bit faster now. Did anyone
do some before after comparisons?
Yep, I did some very basic benchmarks (ab, ZopeProfiler, PTProfiler).
For the front-page for an anonymous user the rough numbers were:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>>
>> So right now one easy way of getting some more performance is to turn
>> the remaining old-style portlets into new-style ones.
>
> This will happen, it's mostly just manual work. The only hard one
> remaining is the calendar one, plus I want to
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
So right now one easy way of getting some more performance is to turn
the remaining old-style portlets into new-style ones.
This will happen, it's mostly just manual work. The only hard one
remaining is the calendar one, pl
On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 10:47:37 -0800, Martin Aspeli
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perhaps we should move it to plone.app.controlpanel, though? I'm a bit
worried about CMFPlone.browser becoming as big as CMFPlone/skins
+1. The control panel stuff deserves its own space, and will hopefully be
ex
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 05:53:11 -0800, Alexander Limi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was prompted to do this when I discovered that anonymous view of Plone
3.0 was about 30% slower than 2.5. Take these numbers as a general guide
only, it's still early in the 3.0 process, and there's bound to be
