On May 6, 2009, at 5:15 PM, Steve McMahon wrote:
We need to move the Plone 2009 proposal forward (whether it's 3.5 or
4.0).
first of all, thanks for following up on this, steve!
I'd like to suggest that the combined Plone 3 and 4 framework teams
make the decisions on this.
i'm not
On May 6, 2009, at 5:15 PM, Steve McMahon wrote:
I suggest that the Framework Teams try to make the basic decisions and
suggest a release manager by May 13th. That will allow the board to
take it up at our May14th meeting.
oh, and +1 on that.
andi
--
zeidler it consulting - http://zitc.de/
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 18:16, Martijn Pieters m...@zopatista.com wrote:
1) Should there be a significant new feature release of Plone this
year? What are its most basic goals? Which framework team is in
charge?
[..]
I'd nominate the incumbent 3.x team for this; this team already has
the
Rob Gietema wrote:
I'd nominate the incumbent 3.x team for this; this team already has
the mindset to get this going; the future plone team (trunk team?) is
focusing on vision right now, which I think may not be what's needed
for an in-between team.
On second
Let me ask what the level of enthusiasm is in the current P3 framework
team. If they'd shift to become the new Plone 2009 team and the
existing p4 team would become the trunk team, that might be good. We
could recruit to add to the new Plone 2009 (old P3) team if some folks
are burned out.
IMHO,
Since the new Plone 4 is looking like, essentially, a transitional
release, another possibility would be to pull its framework team
members from each of the currently-existing teams.
Eric
On May 7, 2009, at 7:58 PM, Steve McMahon wrote:
Let me ask what the level of enthusiasm is in the
