I don't consider it a disaster. To me it's more about the community
learning from mistakes, identifying areas of improvement and getting
better by each release. If we were more happy with Plone 2.5 than 3,
we would have a real problem. :)
Actually, 2.5 had a lot going for it. We still have
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Eric Steele ems...@psu.edu wrote:
Folks,
A gentle prod since Steve wants to have something to vote on by Friday
There seems to be general agreement on the hybrid team idea. Can we pare
this down to a list of 7 people?
We currently have responses of:
We currently have responses of:
available: Raphael (3), Ross (4), Matt (4)
unavailable: Andi (3)
I'm available. If a million other people want to do it, I'll be
equally happy to bow out and just write a bunch of PLIPs.
Erik
___
Framework-Team
By my reading, here is the list of those willing to participate in a
Plone 4 framework team:
Raphael R.
Ross P.
Matthew W.
David G.
Calvin H.P.
Alec M.
Erik R,
Laurence R.
That's eight names, and an excellent set of skills for a release
that's not likely to emphasize UI work.
If you'd like your
On May 12, 2009, at 4:23 PM, Steve McMahon wrote:
Ideally, a framework team should have an odd number of members in
order to avoid tie votes. However, in watching the last couple of
voting sessions for Plone 3, I noticed that there were not that many
PLIPS on which every person voted. So, I
